2026-01-13 06:00:36

Reusable rocket technology is becoming a game-changer for space infrastructure. Cost-effective launch capabilities would dramatically expand operational scope and accelerate satellite deployment pipelines. The real question isn't whether the technology works—it's whether there's sufficient market demand to absorb the supply surge.

Satellite services span multiple sectors: communications, Earth observation, IoT connectivity, and precision positioning. Yet commercialization remains uneven. While some segments show strong adoption (particularly in remote connectivity), others face adoption friction or price sensitivity. The bottleneck shifts from launch capacity to service monetization.

What happens when supply of launches grows faster than demand for satellite services? We might see pricing compression, consolidation among operators, or pivots toward niche, high-margin applications. The next phase won't be measured in launch success rates—it'll be measured in how many satellite operators can actually turn revenue.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaMaximalist

· 01-14 18:40

honestly this is just supply-demand 101 dressed up as space innovation... everyone's obsessed with the tech side but ngl the real bottleneck was always going to shift to adoption curves and network effects. it's literally what happened with every infrastructure play—capacity means nothing if demand isn't there to absorb it. the ones who get this early will have massive arbitrage opportunities tho

Reply0

FlashLoanPrince

· 01-14 06:54

At the end of the day, it's all about being able to make money. Cool technology is useless if it can't be sold.

View OriginalReply0

0xSherlock

· 01-13 23:15

At the end of the day, it's still the old pattern of oversupply. The rocket costs have come down, but that has actually intensified satellite services. People are starting to boast again about not making money. This time, it should be the operators facing layoffs. Remote areas have demand but no money, while urban markets are saturated—an awkward position. The real issue is that the business logic hasn't kept up with technological progress. Space infrastructure isn't a money-burning game; it's about who survives until the end.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-cff9c776

· 01-13 06:28

In simple terms, this is the classic tragedy of supply-side reform meeting weak demand, similar to the ICO bubble of the past. The rocket becomes cheaper, but no one is buying the service? How awkward is that? Technological innovators become victims of overcapacity. Starlink users should start to panic now. It's not that the technology isn't good enough; it's just that not enough people are willing to pay for the Starlink story. The wave of mergers is coming. Let's see who kneels first and begs for mercy. If it weren't for government orders supporting this wave, the price war might have lasted until the sky turned dark.

View OriginalReply0

FortuneTeller42

· 01-13 06:26

Basically, it's an oversupply coming, let's see who can survive until the end.

View OriginalReply0

HodlOrRegret

· 01-13 06:21

Oversupply kills everything; this situation should have been seen coming long ago.

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 01-13 06:19

Honestly, I've heard the logic that rockets are cheap due to oversupply too many times. The same old story—no one pays for air. At the end of the day, satellite business still requires someone to pay; otherwise, launching even at a lower cost is pointless. If this wave truly results in overcapacity, I’m optimistic about which companies will survive the final wave of mergers. It's another story of having technology but lacking market; it feels like we've seen this script play out many times in crypto too. If a price war starts, small operators are really in trouble; only the top players can get a slice of the cake.

View OriginalReply0

ContractExplorer

· 01-13 06:10

Basically, it's oversupply. Rockets are cheap, but satellites can't be launched.

View OriginalReply0