2026-01-13 05:20:30

Many people only see the surface—Walrus is just a decentralized storage tool. In fact, this judgment is far from accurate.

Let's look at it from a different perspective: what are AI, high-frequency trading, and similar technologies most afraid of? They're afraid of data being tampered with. If your training set is altered by even a single point, the conclusions drawn by the model become nonsense. If the news source is changed, trading decisions collapse accordingly. That’s the real risk.

In the past, everyone competed over storage capacity—how much data they could hold. Now, the true determinant of victory is whether data can be verified, traced, and trusted. Walrus aims to do exactly that: make "data trustworthiness" a fundamental attribute, not an afterthought patch.

From a technical standpoint, it introduces a concept called PoA (Point of Availability). Simply put: from the moment an event is recorded on a certain chain, the system is responsible for the availability of that data. What you upload is no longer just a file, but a data block with an encrypted identity card. Lifecycle, accessibility, and traceability information—all can be observed and verified on the chain.

On January 8th, Walrus officially published an article discussing how to reconcile scalability and decentralization. The core logic is quite interesting: instead of tying power and rewards to size and fame, they are tied to verifiable actions. In other words, your contributions can be clearly quantified, making the incentive mechanism fairer and more transparent.

Looking at it this way, Walrus is not just a storage protocol; it’s more like an infrastructure for "programmable data." The entire lifecycle and commercial attributes of data can be programmed, priced, and authorized on the chain. That’s the real problem it aims to solve.

WAL8,09%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

24 Likes

Reward
24
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidationHunter

· 20h ago

Data credibility is the core, and this point is right. PoA's logic is indeed powerful; decentralizing verification rights is truly decentralization. However, the question is, after scaling up, can the nodes really maintain this verifiability?

View OriginalReply0

GlueGuy

· 20h ago

Damn, someone finally explained it thoroughly. Most people really just stay at the level of storage tools and completely miss the core. Data tampering is indeed terrifying; if one parameter is wrong, the whole system fails. The PoA design still has some merit, but can it really be implemented at scale? It feels like designing data as a tradable asset, which is much deeper than just piling up capacity. The logical chain is a bit convoluted, but thinking in reverse really hits the pain points.

View OriginalReply0

WagmiOrRekt

· 23h ago

Really, the trustworthiness of data is indeed the key to the future. --- PoA's logic is essentially "nailing" the data down, so there's no more room for sneaky modifications. --- Wait, the incentive mechanism is tied to verifiable behaviors... Isn't this effectively eliminating the power game at the architectural level? --- Oh my, I used to think of Walrus as just a cloud storage, but now it seems I underestimated it. --- Data programmability and pricing feel a bit like giving information itself smart contracts. --- Honestly, if AI folks really adopt this system, the risk of training data being tampered with could be reduced by 99%. --- The way of tying power and rewards has changed, and behind it is a whole revolution in the incentive model. --- But have they really solved the problem of scalability and decentralization compatibility? --- Is all accessibility tracked on-chain? Is this a blessing or a curse for data privacy? --- The analogy of encrypted ID cards is quite vivid, like giving each data block a household registration.

View OriginalReply0

TommyTeacher1

· 01-13 05:49

Damn, this is the analysis I want to hear. Looking at storage alone is too superficial. Data credibility is indeed the core competitive advantage in the future, and many people haven't realized it yet. The PoA mechanism is quite interesting; I need to study it further. Walrus's approach is completely different from previous storage projects; it feels like they've found the real problem. Programmable data infrastructure? I like this concept; it's much more advanced than just simple storage. The incentive mechanism is tied to contribution quantification, which can truly attract genuine participants. Must keep an eye on Walrus's progress; there's definitely something here.

View OriginalReply0

pumpamentalist

· 01-13 05:47

Amazing, finally someone has broken through this layer of window paper Data credibility is the true key, storage is just an illusion PoA design is truly outstanding, far superior to those flashy storage schemes Programmable data? Isn't this the final piece of Web3? Suddenly I understand why so many institutions are paying attention to this, it's more than just storage Honestly, when I saw the article on January 8, I sensed something different Incentives tied to behavior rather than volume—this logic is quite ruthless In one sentence, data trustworthiness > storage capacity, now the market pattern is about to change Finally no more worries about data being stolen or altered, truly peace of mind If this thing really takes off, those old-school storage solutions can retire

View OriginalReply0

WalletWhisperer

· 01-13 05:43

This perspective is indeed excellent. Data credibility is the true core; storage is just a shell. PoA is a fierce move, taking responsibility from the very second of recording. No wonder everyone is chasing it; it feels like the next narrative point is right here. But when it comes to scalability, can it really hold up? So Walrus = the operating system for programmable data, got it.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-13 05:41

Wow, this is the real point—data credibility is much more valuable than storage capacity.

View OriginalReply0

CountdownToBroke

· 01-13 05:36

This guy's point is spot on; trustworthy data is the key. But how long will it take for those who truly adopt this system? PoA sounds like a big deal, but can it scale? Walrus indeed thought further ahead than others this time. On-chain programmable data sounds powerful, but I'm worried it might end up just being a storage tool. Why haven't people done a good job with data traceability before? So ultimately, it's about giving data an ID card—nothing too special. Transparent incentive mechanisms are a good thing, but how difficult is it to implement this theory? Verifiable behaviors sound like the old, familiar logic of Web3. Only those who truly see through it are genuine; no need to follow the hype about storage capacity.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeSobber