2026-01-13 05:00:32

Powell's pushback tends to come when Trump isn't directly targeting the Fed chair. There's an interesting dynamic at play—when Trump goes after other policy areas or officials, Powell maintains a more measured stance. But when Trump shifts focus elsewhere and isn't personally attacking him, Powell appears more willing to take a firm public position. This political calculation reveals how Fed leadership navigates the complex relationship between monetary policy and political pressure. For traders watching Fed policy signals, understanding these interpersonal dynamics can offer insights into how monetary decisions might be communicated or adjusted.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

22 Likes

Reward
22
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingersFOMO

· 01-14 21:28

Haha, this is political game theory. Basically, it depends on who gets scolded first. Once someone is named and shamed, they get scared—that kind of mentality... Traders have long seen through Powell's tricks, no wonder people in the crypto circle say that you should do the opposite of what the Fed says. This kind of political scheming ultimately hurts retail investors the most. Powell's tactics are just like us retail traders—living by reading the market sentiment. Wow, even the central bank has started playing psychological warfare. In one sentence, monetary policy decisions under political pressure are completely unreliable. When Trump throws in the towel, Powell becomes more assertive—feels like a couple's argument... Now I understand, the Fed's decisions on the surface are useless; it’s all about the leadership's interpersonal relationships. At the end of the day, it’s a power game; policies are just a facade.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 01-14 06:46

Research shows that Powell's "selective confrontation" logic essentially reflects an interesting political game model—it's worth noting that this behavioral pattern is not random but aligns with the expectations of rational actor theory. From a technical perspective, we can analyze it as follows: when Trump directly targets, Powell tends to remain silent (reducing the risk of conflict escalation); when the focus shifts, Powell dares to speak out (political costs decrease). This nonlinear response mechanism has been discussed similarly in Blinder's 2021 paper on central bank independence. The question is—what does this mean for us traders? Merely looking at the Fed's statements might be misleading due to this political noise; we need to learn to distinguish between genuine policy signals and superficial rhetoric. It's a bit exhausting.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseFOMOguy

· 01-13 05:30

Haha, Powell, this trick is too obvious. You can dodge the first day, but not the fifteenth.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 01-13 05:28

Haha, isn't this just political game-playing? Whoever gets their sore spot poked will just act tough.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 01-13 05:26

Powell's approach of "changing course with the wind" essentially amounts to a dynamic adjustment of the collateral ratio under political pressure... When the threshold is triggered, the stance shifts. This risk control awareness indeed has issues.

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 01-13 05:20

Haha, even old Powell has to play political games.

View OriginalReply0

ChainPoet