This viewpoint is well-founded. The crypto community remains cautious about assets beyond Bitcoin, due to many practical reasons—over the years, various project teams have employed countless tricks.
But here’s a turning point. Using 3 months of performance to criticize institutions that do asset allocation is not the solution. Instead, we should adopt a more open attitude towards these participants. Tolerance and rational discussion are more conducive to ecosystem progress than outright rejection. Trust often needs to be built gradually through practice.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotAFinancialAdvice
· 01-13 04:56
To be honest, this set of arguments sounds reasonable, but it still feels a bit naive. We've seen the institutional playbook before, and no one has found the people who ran away in three months.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyer
· 01-13 04:55
Honestly, wanting to draw a conclusion in just 3 months is indeed an illogical stance.
However, I can't quite see through this wave of institutional entry... Trust is something that needs to be built over time.
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPC
· 01-13 04:43
To put it simply, the crypto world loves to be absolute, with a black-and-white mindset. Three months of data hitting hard is indeed tough, but then completely denying institutions? Isn't that another extreme?
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretter
· 01-13 04:37
That's true, but is it really that easy to let go? The shadow of various scam projects still lingers.
This viewpoint is well-founded. The crypto community remains cautious about assets beyond Bitcoin, due to many practical reasons—over the years, various project teams have employed countless tricks.
But here’s a turning point. Using 3 months of performance to criticize institutions that do asset allocation is not the solution. Instead, we should adopt a more open attitude towards these participants. Tolerance and rational discussion are more conducive to ecosystem progress than outright rejection. Trust often needs to be built gradually through practice.