NYC token has attracted a lot of attention, but I am more interested in meme-type derivative coins that actually have trading opportunities. Taking NYC as an example, the current trading volume is quite good, and many well-known wallets are bottom-fishing. The risks are indeed high, but as a small-scale gamble, it’s still interesting. These kinds of projects require precise timing — when trading volume increases and big players follow, there are often short-term opportunities. Of course, the suspense lies in how long it can hold up, so it’s only suitable for playing with spare funds.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SurvivorshipBias
· 01-16 02:22
Playing with spare money is fine, just worried about messing up the rhythm.
View OriginalReply0
ArbitrageBot
· 01-16 02:21
Playing with spare money is fine, but I'm afraid of losing everything and going back to the pre-liberation days haha
View OriginalReply0
DaisyUnicorn
· 01-16 02:18
The moment when the big players start to buy the dip is like watching a flower bloom. It's beautiful, but who knows if it will wither away in the next second?
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 01-15 19:18
Playing with spare money is fine, but really throwing in a lot of money is just a gambling dog mentality.
View OriginalReply0
SorryRugPulled
· 01-13 02:52
Playing with spare money is playing with spare money. That's what I thought last time, and I'm still on the floor now.
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomnia
· 01-13 02:51
Playing with spare money is okay, but you need to identify the right entry points of major investors.
View OriginalReply0
ChainBrain
· 01-13 02:48
I agree with playing with spare money, but buddy, it's easier said than done to keep the rhythm.
There are indeed signs of big players stepping in on this NYC move, but be careful not to get caught and blame others.
Jumping in as soon as the volume increases? I've seen too many tragedies to be so reckless.
Anyway, it's just a game of probabilities. If you make a profit, tell the story; if you lose, consider it tuition.
View OriginalReply0
PebbleHander
· 01-13 02:46
Playing with spare money is fine, but you really need to keep a close eye on the movements of big players.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifier
· 01-13 02:38
ngl the "known wallets accumulating" narrative requires further auditing—statistically improbable they're all acting independently... technically speaking, that's either orchestrated or your data validation is insufficient. where's the on-chain proof tbh
Reply0
GasFeeDodger
· 01-13 02:36
Playing with spare money is fine, just worried about accidentally going all in.
NYC token has attracted a lot of attention, but I am more interested in meme-type derivative coins that actually have trading opportunities. Taking NYC as an example, the current trading volume is quite good, and many well-known wallets are bottom-fishing. The risks are indeed high, but as a small-scale gamble, it’s still interesting. These kinds of projects require precise timing — when trading volume increases and big players follow, there are often short-term opportunities. Of course, the suspense lies in how long it can hold up, so it’s only suitable for playing with spare funds.