Key shift in the global economic dialogue: policymakers are leaning toward smart derisking rather than full decoupling. What does this mean for critical minerals? There's growing consensus that nations need to strengthen supply chain resilience, especially for resources essential to tech infrastructure and blockchain networks. The focus is on building redundancy and diversification—not cutting ties completely. This approach could reshape how we think about global resources and dependencies in the Web3 era.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
26 Likes
Reward
26
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TommyTeacher1
· 01-15 12:08
Talking about derisking is not as good as directly bottom-fishing for rare earth minerals; the real alpha is here.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayer
· 01-14 19:04
Smart risk mitigation sounds good, but what is the reality? When it comes to key minerals, it still depends on who holds the initiative.
View OriginalReply0
MercilessHalal
· 01-14 02:39
Smart derisking sounds good, but frankly, it's still each country playing their own games in resource competition.
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrince
· 01-13 02:41
Smart risk reduction sounds good, but in the end, isn't it just major countries competing for mining rights? True decentralization still depends on Web3.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 01-13 02:38
Smart derisking sounds good, but can it really be implemented? It still feels like each country is doing its own thing.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretter
· 01-13 02:34
Smart derisking sounds good, but in reality? We'll still be held back, right?
View OriginalReply0
orphaned_block
· 01-13 02:32
Forget it, derisking sounds fancy but it's just a rebranding and politicization; real supply chain resilience isn't something that can be bought with money.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeTrustFund
· 01-13 02:25
Listening closely, well, isn't this exactly what I've been saying all along? The decoupling approach is outdated; smart derisking is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerPrivateKey
· 01-13 02:23
Smart derisking sounds good, but in reality, everyone still does their own thing, and the bottleneck problem in mineral resources has not been solved at all.
Key shift in the global economic dialogue: policymakers are leaning toward smart derisking rather than full decoupling. What does this mean for critical minerals? There's growing consensus that nations need to strengthen supply chain resilience, especially for resources essential to tech infrastructure and blockchain networks. The focus is on building redundancy and diversification—not cutting ties completely. This approach could reshape how we think about global resources and dependencies in the Web3 era.