Here's something worth thinking about: if AI is really going to disrupt a business, you'd see warning signs before it happens. The industry has now been riding this AI wave for three years straight—so at this point, those companies that are vulnerable? Their weaknesses would already be surfacing. The question isn't whether AI will impact markets, but which players saw it coming and which ones got caught off guard.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Gm_Gn_Merchant
· 3h ago
It's been three years of hype about AI, but the companies that are truly dead have already gone bankrupt. The ones still around are just pretending to be prepared.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecoder
· 22h ago
Three years have passed and AI hasn't replaced us yet, which means those who needed to adapt have already done so. Most of the current hype is just a gimmick.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 01-14 11:56
It's been three years. I checked the large wallet clusters on the chain, and the transfer records of those institutional addresses that withdrew early are indeed suspicious... Those who truly know the industry have already moved elsewhere.
View OriginalReply0
TokenToaster
· 01-13 02:36
It's been three years without falling behind, so those still panicking now are mostly the ones with issues themselves.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollector
· 01-13 02:36
Three years of hype about AI, it's long been clear who is actually working and who is just hyping concepts.
View OriginalReply0
NFTragedy
· 01-13 02:30
It's about time to think this way. After three years of shouting "wolf," it's really time to wake up.
View OriginalReply0
MevSandwich
· 01-13 02:27
Three years have passed, and we're still talking about AI disruption. Those who were going to go bankrupt probably already did. Those still alive are just old foxes who have dodged a bullet.
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNut
· 01-13 02:26
I've seen through it long ago. The slow-reacting bunch should be going bankrupt now.
View OriginalReply0
TopEscapeArtist
· 01-13 02:19
Still not falling after three years? I think you're talking about a bottom signal. Don't jump to conclusions before the MACD has a bearish crossover.
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCut
· 01-13 02:08
Companies that haven't failed after three years either truly have some skills or are not yet in a position for AI to cut in.
Here's something worth thinking about: if AI is really going to disrupt a business, you'd see warning signs before it happens. The industry has now been riding this AI wave for three years straight—so at this point, those companies that are vulnerable? Their weaknesses would already be surfacing. The question isn't whether AI will impact markets, but which players saw it coming and which ones got caught off guard.