2026-01-13 01:57:31

On-chain data has shown some anomalies again. According to Arkham's monitoring data, the address associated with Mt. Gox hacker Aleksey Bilyuchenko transferred 926 BTC to an unknown exchange today. This operation has attracted quite a bit of attention.

The underlying issue behind the numbers is even more worth pondering. This related address still holds 3,000 BTC, which is roughly worth $275 million at today's prices. If this amount were to be moved, it would definitely put some pressure on the market.

However, there is a key suspense here: analysts cannot be certain whether these assets are actually being operated by Bilyuchenko himself. After all, this guy was sentenced to 3.5 years in prison in Moscow, and the current situation is not very clear. So, the true control behind this series of operations remains a question mark.

BTC-0,85%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

TommyTeacher

· 4h ago

926 BTC were transferred overnight. This guy really dares to operate.

View OriginalReply0

DevChive

· 5h ago

Here we go again, this time it's the Mt.Gox issue, it's really a multi-layered mess.

View OriginalReply0

NFTBlackHole

· 01-15 04:12

Here we go again. These antique addresses cause a panic across the entire network whenever they move. 926 BTC can be lost in an instant. Who knows if it's real or fake...

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 01-13 02:24

926 BTC thrown to an unknown exchange, this guy really can't sit still Can't even figure out his true identity, what use is on-chain data Still holding 3000 coins, sharpening the axe and heading for pigs and sheep If it really is him operating, then all this prison time was for nothing? The market is probably going to be crushed again by these ghosts

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanKing

· 01-13 02:22

Bro, I really can't hold it anymore. Sending 926 coins to an unknown exchange, just waiting for a dump.

View OriginalReply0

NftMetaversePainter

· 01-13 02:22

actually the real cipher here isn't the hash value of those addresses—it's the algorithmic uncertainty baked into chain analysis itself. who controls what is basically a computational ghost in the machine rn

Reply0

gm_or_ngmi

· 01-13 02:14

It's the same old trick again. I really don't know who is moving this money.

View OriginalReply0

FlippedSignal