2026-01-13 00:53:58

Trump just dropped a statement demanding Microsoft take action to shield consumers from footing the bill for AI infrastructure buildout. The underlying issue? As data centers and AI training facilities scale up globally, energy consumption skyrockets—and someone's gotta pay for it.

The pushback here is straightforward: why should everyday users absorb these massive power costs through higher electricity rates or service fees when tech giants are pulling in record profits from AI deployment? It's essentially asking whether the burden of technological advancement should fall on corporations driving the gains or get passed down to consumers.

This opens up broader questions for the tech sector: How will major players like Microsoft navigate rising infrastructure costs while maintaining competitive margins? Will we see innovation in energy efficiency, renewable integration, or cost-shifting models? The pressure to demonstrate corporate responsibility in the AI era is clearly mounting, and it could reshape how companies structure their buildout strategies moving forward.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCrier

· 3h ago

Laughing to death, it's the same old story again. The big shots throw money into AI, and in the end, it's still us who foot the bill.

View OriginalReply0

ETHReserveBank

· 9h ago

Ha, it's the same old story again. Microsoft should pay up; why should our users foot the bill? Speaking of big tech companies making a fortune, then turning around and making consumers pay—who came up with that logic? Who's responsible for energy costs? That's really a problem... Forget it, in the end, it's still us who pay.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetectiveBing

· 01-14 00:42

Forget it, big companies are just passing the buck again, and in the end, we still have to pay the bill. --- With Trump doing this, Microsoft will be forced to make a statement, but who dares to touch the profits? --- The surge in energy costs is, frankly, the result of tech companies trying to monopolize. --- Sounds good, but does Microsoft really intend to pay out of pocket? Come on. --- Big companies should bear the responsibility themselves; why shift the burden to ordinary people? This logic is too absurd. --- AI is burning electricity at a rapid rate, now they’re starting to pass the buck. If only we knew this earlier, why did we do it in the first place? --- This move is just to create momentum for regulatory pressure; otherwise, who would voluntarily give up profits? --- The core issue is simply this: who will ultimately foot the bill? The answer is obvious. --- Pre-show before the next round of price hikes, everyone get your wallets ready. --- Microsoft: We’ve innovated, but you’ll bear the costs. How do you plan to settle this account?

View OriginalReply0

FundingMartyr

· 01-13 01:24

Here comes the harvest again, Microsoft and these guys should have been regulated long ago --- ngl this is the old trick of big tech companies, passing the costs onto us small users --- Laughing to death, why should I pay for their AI when I pay for electricity? --- Trump is right, these companies are making a fortune and want ordinary people to foot the bill? --- Energy costs are skyrocketing, in the end, it's still us consumers who have to bleed --- Basically, it depends on who covers the bottom line. Microsoft definitely wants to shift it to users, now that they've been caught --- If they could really force Microsoft to bear the costs themselves, that would be news, otherwise it's just the same old trick --- Haha, I just want to see how they choose between profit and conscience --- If this wind picks up, the entire cloud computing industry will have to start from scratch

View OriginalReply0

quietly_staking

· 01-13 01:23

Speaking of which, big tech companies make huge profits, yet ordinary people have to pay the electricity bills. This trick is really clever.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullProphet

· 01-13 01:21

Coming to cut the leeks again? Microsoft should bear the cost themselves.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletGuardian

· 01-13 01:21

Trying to shift the blame to big investors again? Haha --- Microsoft is probably going to be called out to take the blame this time --- Honestly, consumers still have to pay the price. This trick is all too familiar --- Energy costs are skyrocketing, and in the end, we’re the ones footing the bill --- Trump is right this time. Why should tech giants make ordinary people spend their money? --- If they really want to innovate and control costs, stop just shifting the burden onto users --- This shows how greedy big companies are --- AI infrastructure consumes electricity, but the profits go into the bosses’ pockets? --- The energy crisis is here. Tech companies should reflect on this --- Consumers are the scapegoats; it turns out we have to do this work

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretDiary

· 01-13 01:15

Are you blaming consumers again? Laughing to death, big companies eat the meat while we drink the soup --- Why doesn't Microsoft take responsibility themselves and make users pay? --- The rise in energy costs should have been addressed long ago. Tech companies are making huge profits while we bear the burden --- This is just the daily operation of monopolistic capital, nothing new --- The problem is that big companies don't care at all... unless they are really fined and forced to pay --- Renewable energy sounds good, but it's all just empty promises. The key is profit > environmental protection --- I just want to know who will ultimately compromise. It definitely won't be the big companies --- It's that same rhetoric again, "We promise to invest in clean energy," and then... nothing --- Forget it, this kind of pressure doesn't affect their financial reports, so they don't care

View OriginalReply0