[Block Rhythm] BlackRock’s latest 2026 Global Outlook report has attracted market attention. The report reveals several key logical points about this year’s market—first is the so-called “micro is macro” phenomenon.
What does it mean? It means AI development is now concentrated in the hands of a few tech giants, whose capital expenditures are large enough to influence the entire national economy. It is estimated that between 2025 and 2030, AI infrastructure investments could reach $5-8 trillion. This money supports U.S. economic growth, and BlackRock estimates its contribution to GDP growth is three times the historical average. Even if the labor market cools down, this scale of investment can maintain economic resilience. But here’s the question—can revenue keep up with such massive spending? Historically, over the past 150 years, technological revolutions have not broken the U.S. long-term 2% growth ceiling, but this time, it might truly be an exception.
The second risk is called “leverage increase.” AI builders have made huge upfront investments, but profits lag behind, leading to an overall increase in system leverage. Coupled with high government debt, vulnerability arises. BlackRock therefore tactically reduces long-term government bonds and favors private credit and infrastructure financing opportunities.
The third pitfall is the “diversification illusion.” Under the influence of major trends, seemingly diversified investment portfolios may actually be concentrated bets. Investors need to actively hold risk, stay flexible, and pay attention to the non-correlation returns of private markets and hedge funds.
Most interestingly, BlackRock redefines stablecoins and digital assets—not as speculative tools, but as infrastructure (plumbing) of the financial system. Stablecoins are seen as “digital dollar tracks,” evolving from native crypto tools into bridges connecting traditional finance and digital liquidity. In areas like cross-border payments and settlements—especially in regions where traditional systems are slow, expensive, and fragmented—the role of stablecoins is becoming prominent. This signals that crypto is integrating into mainstream finance, and building digital asset infrastructure is an inevitable trend.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoCross-TalkClub
· 01-14 15:26
Laughing out loud, 5-8 trillion yuan poured in just to break the 2% growth ceiling? How much money does that take? It feels like project funding—whitepapers promising the moon, but actual implementation is less than double digits.
---
Micro equals macro. In simple terms, the CapEx of a few big firms determines the entire US economy. Isn't this just a centralized version of the "leek's fate"?
---
Can revenue keep up? Are you joking? Asking this question is like asking "When will the project team list on the exchange" in the crypto world—only clairvoyants can answer that.
---
Haven't broken 2% in 150 years, is this time an exception? When BlackRock says this, it sounds like "this time is really different." The most common phrase among old crypto veterans is this one.
---
Leverage is increasing. I'm just waiting to see when a big liquidation happens—like a wild liquidation festival in the US stock market.
View OriginalReply0
PumpingCroissant
· 01-13 20:37
5-8 trillion yuan poured in, are you just hoping that a few tech giants can support it? Is that reliable...
---
Oh, it's that same "this time is different" argument again, I'm tired of hearing it
---
Can stablecoins really become the financial infrastructure? I have my doubts
---
Micro equals macro... basically, big companies call the shots
---
The risks of rising leverage haven't been clearly explained at all, it's a bit shallow
---
Revenue can't keep up with investment growth, that's the real problem
---
The 150-year unbroken ceiling is about to be broken? I damn well don't believe it
---
BlackRock is at it again, just the old routine
View OriginalReply0
ForkTrooper
· 01-13 01:10
50 to 80 trillion? Oh my god, that's basically betting on the US stock market breaking through the ceiling. It's a bit exciting.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 01-13 01:10
ngl the 5-8T capex narrative feels like classic hype cycle... blockchain data from previous tech booms shows similar patterns right before corrections hit hard. where's the actual revenue runway tho? transaction patterns suggest most of this flows to mega caps already, textbook wealth concentration play if u ask me
Reply0
DAOdreamer
· 01-13 01:01
5-8 trillion poured in, and in the end, it's still those big companies taking the profits, while we drink the soup...
View OriginalReply0
ForkMaster
· 01-13 00:58
5-8 trillion yuan invested in AI infrastructure, who can handle this wealth code? Big tech eats the meat, and we get the soup.
BlackRock 2026 Outlook: AI Infrastructure Investment of $5-8 Trillion to Reshape U.S. Stocks, Stablecoins as New Financial Infrastructure
[Block Rhythm] BlackRock’s latest 2026 Global Outlook report has attracted market attention. The report reveals several key logical points about this year’s market—first is the so-called “micro is macro” phenomenon.
What does it mean? It means AI development is now concentrated in the hands of a few tech giants, whose capital expenditures are large enough to influence the entire national economy. It is estimated that between 2025 and 2030, AI infrastructure investments could reach $5-8 trillion. This money supports U.S. economic growth, and BlackRock estimates its contribution to GDP growth is three times the historical average. Even if the labor market cools down, this scale of investment can maintain economic resilience. But here’s the question—can revenue keep up with such massive spending? Historically, over the past 150 years, technological revolutions have not broken the U.S. long-term 2% growth ceiling, but this time, it might truly be an exception.
The second risk is called “leverage increase.” AI builders have made huge upfront investments, but profits lag behind, leading to an overall increase in system leverage. Coupled with high government debt, vulnerability arises. BlackRock therefore tactically reduces long-term government bonds and favors private credit and infrastructure financing opportunities.
The third pitfall is the “diversification illusion.” Under the influence of major trends, seemingly diversified investment portfolios may actually be concentrated bets. Investors need to actively hold risk, stay flexible, and pay attention to the non-correlation returns of private markets and hedge funds.
Most interestingly, BlackRock redefines stablecoins and digital assets—not as speculative tools, but as infrastructure (plumbing) of the financial system. Stablecoins are seen as “digital dollar tracks,” evolving from native crypto tools into bridges connecting traditional finance and digital liquidity. In areas like cross-border payments and settlements—especially in regions where traditional systems are slow, expensive, and fragmented—the role of stablecoins is becoming prominent. This signals that crypto is integrating into mainstream finance, and building digital asset infrastructure is an inevitable trend.