Most profitable companies now command nearly two-thirds of the entire market. Is this market concentration a sign of healthy consolidation or something to worry about?
This shift in capital distribution raises questions about market dynamics and where liquidity flows. When profitability becomes this concentrated among top performers, smaller players face pressure. The gap widens fast.
What does this mean for market participants? Fewer dominant forces shaping the direction, while the rest scramble for relevance. Worth monitoring how this concentration evolves.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-a5fa8bd0
· 12h ago
This level of concentration is a bit frightening. The top players are eating the meat while the bottom ones are drinking the soup. Is there still a way out for small coins and small projects?
View OriginalReply0
NewPumpamentals
· 18h ago
The Matthew Effect is becoming more and more obvious; the old saying of big fish eating small fish never goes out of style.
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlIt
· 23h ago
Eating meat at the head and drinking soup at the tail, this is the current situation... How can small coins survive?
View OriginalReply0
MetaDreamer
· 01-13 16:20
Wow, this is the winner-takes-all situation. Small retail investors are crying.
View OriginalReply0
QuietlyStaking
· 01-13 01:01
The whole concept of capital centralization... has long been seen through. The game of big fish eating small fish will never end.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSnapHunter
· 01-13 00:53
20% of companies take over two-thirds of the market profits... Isn't this just a disguised way of saying the winners take all? What are retail investors still playing at?
View OriginalReply0
YieldWhisperer
· 01-13 00:50
Honestly, two-thirds of the market is monopolized by the giants... This isn't healthy at all; it's a clear case of the Matthew Effect accelerating.
View OriginalReply0
CryingOldWallet
· 01-13 00:46
Wow, is oligopoly so serious? Small retail investors are just kidding themselves.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetScholar
· 01-13 00:37
Really, the pattern of the top eating the meat and the tail drinking the soup is becoming more and more obvious; the 80/20 rule is no longer enough.
Most profitable companies now command nearly two-thirds of the entire market. Is this market concentration a sign of healthy consolidation or something to worry about?
This shift in capital distribution raises questions about market dynamics and where liquidity flows. When profitability becomes this concentrated among top performers, smaller players face pressure. The gap widens fast.
What does this mean for market participants? Fewer dominant forces shaping the direction, while the rest scramble for relevance. Worth monitoring how this concentration evolves.