Here's something worth thinking about: most debanking cases happening across the US aren't random acts by banks. A recent report reveals the pattern—government pressure is driving the majority of these financial service cutoffs.
The trend raises questions for the entire crypto and fintech space. When traditional banking institutions start limiting services, it's rarely a standalone decision. Behind the scenes, regulatory expectations and policy directives often shape which accounts get terminated and which ones stay open.
This dynamic matters because it directly impacts how people access financial services, especially those operating in the Web3 sector. The squeeze on banking access has already pushed more individuals and projects toward decentralized solutions and alternative financial platforms—a shift that could reshape the entire ecosystem over time.
The bigger picture? Understanding who's actually pulling the strings helps explain why debanking has become such a persistent issue for crypto participants and businesses in the US.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LuckyBearDrawer
· 01-14 03:45
Damn, it's the government pulling the strings behind the scenes again. I saw it coming long ago.
---
Banks are really just puppets, obediently following orders from above.
---
Now it's settled. Decentralization is inevitable sooner or later; there's no escaping it.
---
Why not just ban it outright? This whole facade is so hypocritical.
---
So this is why they want to push us onto the chain? Haha.
---
Everyone involved in trading coins has been taken care of. Truly impressive.
---
If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have relied on CEX. Self-custody is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainBouncer
· 01-14 01:12
Uh... is the government pulling the strings behind the scenes? We've seen through this a long time ago, but only now do we dare to say it openly.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 01-12 20:34
It's the same old trick again, really thinking we can't see through it.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 01-12 20:26
Alright, same old story. The government hints, and the banks immediately start to tighten the screws. Whoever it is, they all have to run onto the chain.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainHolmes
· 01-12 20:23
Damn, it's those guys behind the scenes causing trouble again.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryBaby
· 01-12 20:14
ngl that's why I stopped trusting traditional banks long ago; it's all government manipulation behind the scenes.
Here's something worth thinking about: most debanking cases happening across the US aren't random acts by banks. A recent report reveals the pattern—government pressure is driving the majority of these financial service cutoffs.
The trend raises questions for the entire crypto and fintech space. When traditional banking institutions start limiting services, it's rarely a standalone decision. Behind the scenes, regulatory expectations and policy directives often shape which accounts get terminated and which ones stay open.
This dynamic matters because it directly impacts how people access financial services, especially those operating in the Web3 sector. The squeeze on banking access has already pushed more individuals and projects toward decentralized solutions and alternative financial platforms—a shift that could reshape the entire ecosystem over time.
The bigger picture? Understanding who's actually pulling the strings helps explain why debanking has become such a persistent issue for crypto participants and businesses in the US.