I want to build a P Little General Fund ecosystem to try it out. The core mechanism is not complicated—1% transaction tax, of which seventy percent goes directly to the signed-in P Little General, distributed through daily random lottery slots of 5 to 20. The remaining thirty percent is used to maintain on-chain operations and daily maintenance.



The key point here is: instead of throwing the tax into invisible charity projects, it's better to let it flow back into the community itself. We participate together, benefit together, forming a self-sustaining on-chain fund system.

What does everyone think of this logic? Are there better allocation ratios or operational ideas? Welcome to refine the details together and turn this into something that can really run.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrybabyvip
· 7h ago
Hey, really, there's something off about this lottery system The ratio looks random; how did they come up with a 7:3 split? 5 to 20 spots? Can the operational costs be covered? But I still agree with the idea of flowing back into the community, just how to ensure sustainability? Wait, they didn't go into detail about the tax part—could it turn into a way to fleece the users again?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitchvip
· 7h ago
ngl the lottery mechanism here is giving me ponzi energy... 5-20 daily winners out of how many participants? the math starts smelling like alchemy real quick lol
Reply0
NFT_Therapyvip
· 7h ago
This allocation logic is fine, but the random lottery part is prone to disputes... Wait, are operational costs really only 30%? Gas fees on the chain are so expensive? But on the other hand, directing funds to the community is better than hiding them in a black box.
View OriginalReply0
token_therapistvip
· 7h ago
Hmm... This random lottery system sounds a bit like gambling. Can it really retain users?
View OriginalReply0
Web3ExplorerLinvip
· 7h ago
hypothesis: the lottery-based reward distribution here actually mirrors the oracle problem—how do you trustlessly verify who *actually* deserves those daily slots? seems like a gamification layer masking potential sybil vulnerabilities ngl
Reply0
TestnetFreeloadervip
· 7h ago
A 7:3 distribution ratio sounds good, but I'm worried about being gouged on operational costs.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)