
Real World Assets (RWA) refer to the process of digitizing tangible assets by bringing them on-chain. This means converting the income or ownership rights of offline assets—such as bonds, real estate, and receivables—into blockchain-based token representations. These tokens make it easier to hold, transfer, receive dividends, and settle assets transparently. Issuance and custody are typically managed by regulated institutions, with on-chain records providing transparency and allowing holders to redeem their assets at maturity or according to predefined rules.
RWA brings the returns of traditional, stable assets onto the blockchain, enabling you to access “cash flow-generating” opportunities within the crypto ecosystem. For users seeking steady yields, RWAs offer an alternative to purely volatile tokens.
The value proposition of RWA centers on three key points:
However, there are limitations: Many RWA products require KYC and whitelist approval, target qualified investors, may offer lower liquidity than mainstream tokens, and involve higher legal and compliance costs.
The typical RWA process includes: off-chain asset verification, compliant token issuance, on-chain registration and trading, rule-based profit distribution, and support for redemption.
The most common RWA formats are “tokenized funds” and “on-chain debt.” For example, U.S. Treasuries can be structured as redeemable fund shares or SME loans as tradable tokens.
In DeFi, RWAs serve as collateral or yield sources. Some protocols use Treasury fund tokens as underlying assets to generate interest supporting stablecoins or lending rates; others bundle invoices and receivables for investors to receive installment-based cash flows.
On exchanges, retail users typically buy “governance or utility tokens” of RWA protocols. For example, on Gate, you’ll find tokens linked to RWA protocols that represent revenue sharing, governance rights, or ecosystem value—but not direct fund shares. Direct fund shares or debt tokens are usually available only on compliant platforms requiring whitelisting and KYC.
If your goal is “stable yield allocation,” distinguish between: (1) compliant share-based RWA tokens; (2) protocol governance or utility tokens.
This year has seen significant growth in RWA adoption, with closer integration between on-chain and off-chain operations. Statistics from multiple sources indicate that by Q3 2025, the on-chain scale of tokenized USD short-term debt and compliant funds reached several billion dollars—several times higher than in all of 2024. The number of active addresses and transactions has also increased substantially in the past six months.
Structurally, capital is shifting toward “redeemable, transparent NAV” products: share-based Treasury funds have grown faster than on-chain private credit over the past year. During Q2-Q3 2025, leading compliant RWA funds saw individual product sizes surpass $1 billion more frequently—a sign of growing institutional participation.
Interest rates and regulation are key drivers: As of the last six months in 2025, yields on short-term debt products have declined with changing rate expectations but remain attractive. Regulatory guidance for tokenization and custody is being gradually implemented across jurisdictions; whitelist requirements and disclosure standards are becoming more standardized, encouraging greater institutional involvement.
Note: Due to differences in statistical methods, the above reflects public tracking data from Q3 2025 through this year for industry direction—not precise figures.
Stablecoins are primarily designed for “pricing and payments,” maintaining price stability via reserves or algorithms. In contrast, RWAs tokenize real-world assets that generate cash flow or represent rights for investment, dividends, and redemption purposes.
Their underlying structures differ: Stablecoin reserves are mainly cash and short-term debt aimed at pegging a fiat currency’s price; RWAs may be backed by fund shares, debt claims, or real estate with the goal of bringing traditional asset rights on-chain. Risks also vary: Stablecoins focus on reserve transparency and redemption risk; RWAs focus on asset authenticity, compliance access, oracle reliability, and liquidity.
RWA tokens turn physical assets like real estate or bonds into digital certificates on the blockchain, enabling 24/7 trading unconstrained by traditional market hours. Unlike conventional investments that require banks or brokers as intermediaries, RWAs let you directly buy fractionalized assets on exchanges like Gate, lowering entry barriers and transaction costs. However, remember that RWA value still depends on the underlying asset’s real-world worth and the issuer’s credibility.
There are three main risks:
RWAs also involve cross-chain ownership verification; if the issuer goes bankrupt, your on-chain tokens might become worthless. To mitigate risks, choose reputable issuers and established products; diversify your investments.
RWAs are generally better suited for long-term holding since their underlying assets generate ongoing income (like rent or interest). Holding long term allows you to collect stable returns. Short-term trading can be hindered by low liquidity and incurs higher gas fees. If you seek stable returns similar to traditional assets, consider allocating to highly liquid RWA products on Gate for long-term exposure.
Major categories include: real estate tokens (property ownership), bond tokens (corporate/government bonds), commodity tokens (gold, oil). Projects like Ondo Finance and Centrifuge have launched mature offerings. Still, the market is nascent—most RWA products have limited trading volume and user bases—so it’s best to select projects with good liquidity via major platforms like Gate.
This is a core risk in RWA investing. If an issuer goes bankrupt, your tokens could lose all real-world backing unless legal action recovers value. That’s why choosing reputable issuers—preferably traditional financial institutions or those with regulatory oversight—is crucial. Also understand the legal status of your RWAs (such as whether they’re covered by local financial regulations) to assess actual risk.


