
The expense ratio is the proportion of an investment product's annual operating costs relative to its assets, directly impacting the investor's net returns. In simple terms, it represents the percentage of your funds that a product deducts annually as total costs.
In traditional funds and ETFs, the expense ratio typically includes management fees (for fund operation and research), custody fees (for asset safekeeping), and administrative or audit expenses. For crypto and Web3 products, besides platform or protocol management fees, common components include on-chain gas fees (blockchain transaction charges) and performance fees (a percentage taken when certain return targets are met).
Expense ratio is crucial because it directly determines your net returns and its impact compounds over time. Even small differences in annual fees can translate into significant gaps in total assets after several years.
Assuming similar strategies and risk profiles, a lower expense ratio generally means more of your returns are retained. This is particularly important for passive index products, stable yield strategies, or long-term holding plans—every percentage point of cost warrants close attention.
The standard calculation for expense ratio is: total annual operating expenses ÷ average net assets for the year. The result is presented as a percentage, making it easy to compare across different products.
For example, if a fund incurs annual costs of 2 million CNY and has average net assets of 100 million CNY, the expense ratio is 2%. In crypto scenarios, if a strategy includes protocol management fees, periodic rebalancing gas costs, and platform service fees, these can be annualized and divided by the average strategy asset base to arrive at a comparable expense ratio.
For funds and ETFs, the expense ratio is shown in the product documentation or on the official website under the "Fees" section, stated as an annual percentage. It typically covers management fees, custody fees, and operational costs; some products also estimate trading-related expenses.
Passive index funds tend to have lower expense ratios than actively managed funds due to reduced research and trading frequency. Common passive products have expense ratios between 0.05%–0.30%, while active management can range from 1%–2% or higher. These figures vary by market and product type; always refer to official disclosures before investing.
In crypto and Web3, the expense ratio includes protocol or platform management fees, on-chain gas fees, and performance-based charges. Gas fees act like "tolls" on the blockchain and increase during network congestion. Performance fees are deducted as a proportion of gains when targets are met—often ranging from 10%–30% in certain strategies.
Additionally, on-chain transactions incur slippage (the difference between expected and executed prices) and spread (the gap between bid and ask prices). These aren't always directly reflected in the expense ratio but do affect your actual net returns. When evaluating an on-chain strategy, consider both visible and hidden costs.
Expense ratio erodes long-term results through compounding: for the same gross return, higher expenses consistently "thin out" net gains. For example—if annualized gross returns are 7%:
With a 1.5% expense ratio, net return is about 5.5%; with a 0.2% expense ratio, net return is around 6.8%. Over 10 years, the ending value of an initial $10,000 investment would diverge significantly. While actual figures depend on real-world returns and fees, the takeaway is clear: lower expense ratios favor long-term growth.
To check the expense ratio on Gate, follow these steps:
Step 1: Go to the target product page (such as savings, fund-based or strategy products) and locate the "Fee Details" or "Rates" section.
Step 2: Review the fee breakdown, including management fees, platform service charges, whether performance fees apply, and how frequently fees are assessed (daily, monthly, or yearly).
Step 3: For on-chain or hybrid strategies, pay attention to gas costs in operational prompts and rebalancing frequency—assess what percentage these represent on an annualized basis.
Step 4: Compare expense ratios and historical net performance across similar products; prioritize those with transparent fees, lower expense ratios, and sustainable strategies.
Hidden costs can make your actual "expense ratio" higher than the headline figure. Common risks include:
When assessing a product, combine disclosed fees with real trading conditions and activity frequency for a realistic cost assessment.
To lower your expense ratio, focus on reducing unnecessary fees and improving execution efficiency.
Expense ratio offers a "total cost as a percentage" perspective for easy comparison across products. Other common metrics focus on specific aspects:
Understanding these distinctions helps translate "fee schedules" into comparable annual cost percentages.
When making investment decisions, consider the expense ratio alongside risk profile and strategy sustainability. First, confirm that the product matches your risk tolerance and time horizon; then compare expense ratios and fee transparency among peers. For long-term holdings with compounding goals, low and stable expense ratios are usually preferable.
Remember: fees are only part of the equation. Every capital allocation involves market and execution risks—always check official disclosures and risk notices on platforms like Gate, and make prudent choices based on your own situation.
Every additional 1% in expense ratio can erode 10–15% of total returns over time. For example, over 10 years with an 8% annual return rate, increasing the expense ratio from 0.5% to 1.5% could mean a difference of tens of thousands in final gains. This is why long-term investors are highly sensitive to expense ratios—even seemingly minor differences compound significantly over years.
Yes—there are significant differences. Spot trading on exchanges usually incurs an expense ratio of 0.1%–0.3% per transaction (as a single trade fee), while traditional funds often carry annual expense ratios of 1%–2%. Crypto funds or ETFs typically range from 0.1%–0.5%. On platforms like Gate, you can control costs directly with spot trading and low-cost products; whereas high-fee funds can dramatically drag down returns over time due to cumulative annual expenses. Match your product choice to your investment horizon for optimal results.
Because published expense ratios usually only cover management and custody fees—hidden costs like trading commissions, bid-ask spreads, redemption charges, and taxes can add another 0.5%–1%. Before investing, always request a full breakdown of all fees rather than relying solely on headline figures; otherwise, real returns may be lower than expected.
Industry consensus: 0.2%–0.5% is considered low-cost; 0.5%–1% is moderate; above 1% is relatively high. For crypto assets, major platforms like Gate offer spot trading fee rates around 0.1%–0.2%, which is among the lowest in the sector. If your chosen product’s expense ratio exceeds 1%, compare alternatives for potentially better options.
The stated expense ratio itself doesn’t change—but regular investments (dollar-cost averaging) generate multiple transactions which may increase total fees. Monthly contributions mean up to 12 times the transaction costs compared to a one-off investment over a year. However, dollar-cost averaging offers benefits like risk diversification and cost smoothing. On Gate, you can automate recurring buys via investment plans—just be sure to choose low-fee trading pairs to control overall cost.


