How serious are privacy issues in the blockchain world? Every transaction is like being exposed in the sunlight—amounts, addresses, and flow are all transparent. That’s why institutional investors have been hesitant to move large-scale on-chain.



Dusk is rewriting this dilemma with a different approach. It combines Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZK) and Homomorphic Encryption (HE) to achieve a seemingly contradictory goal: transactions are completely private but can still be audited for verification. In simple terms, users’ wallet information is hidden from the outside, but compliant institutions can review the legality of transactions—this is what institutional-grade DeFi should look like.

Citadel’s zero-knowledge KYC solution solves the longstanding challenge of identity verification. Traditional privacy coins are either completely black-box (which draws regulatory suspicion) or compromise on privacy. Dusk’s built-in compliance switch is different; it allows privacy and regulation to coexist, rather than being mutually exclusive.

From a technical comparison, Tron quickly built its ecosystem with low fees and high throughput, but Dusk takes a more refined approach—offering stronger privacy capabilities, targeting a niche but high-end user base. By 2026, as compliance frameworks become clearer, solutions that combine privacy and auditability may open a window for institutional recognition.
DUSK66,53%
TRX1,2%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedAgainvip
· 1h ago
Here comes the privacy concept again. I just want to know—can this ZK+HE setup really withstand regulatory crackdowns? Not being on-chain isn't just a privacy issue; the liquidation price is the real boss. Dusk sounds pretty good, but I've heard the phrase "combining privacy and audit" too many times, and in the end, it all becomes a tool for regulators to leak information. The 2026 window? I think it's a trap for 2026... Small cap niche high-end players, wow, isn't this just a rebrand to catch the bottom and take over? A bloody lesson, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollectorvip
· 1h ago
It sounds like a balance needs to be struck between privacy and regulation, but I still have some doubts that institutions will really buy into this approach. Dusk's idea is good, but the problem is whether the execution will ultimately leave both sides dissatisfied...
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHuntervip
· 1h ago
Honestly, can privacy and compliance truly coexist? Or is it just another story that sounds good?
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRichesvip
· 1h ago
Sounds good, but will institutions really buy it? Feels more like armchair strategizing.
View OriginalReply0
MechanicalMartelvip
· 1h ago
Are privacy and auditing compatible? This idea has some potential; it depends on whether Dusk can really make this work reliably.
View OriginalReply0
Rugpull幸存者vip
· 1h ago
Haha, I feel like this logic is a bit idealistic. Can regulation and privacy truly coexist perfectly?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)