2026-01-17 07:24:32

When looking at Dusk, many people habitually compare metrics like TPS and performance. Actually, this understanding is a bit偏了.

Dusk's core concern is not "how fast the blockchain can run," but rather "what is truly accepted long-term in real financial scenarios." In other words, it cares about order, not flashy tricks.

Why can real-world finance operate stably for so long? Not because of high efficiency, but because of a complete trust structure. How assets are stored, whether transactions are legal, who bears responsibility—these have clear boundaries. To truly carry this part of the value, blockchain needs to rebuild an order system that is equivalent or even stronger.

Dusk never thought about "using code to eliminate rules" as a flashy move; instead, it redefines rules through cryptography. This is a key shift in thinking.

Looking at privacy, Dusk's logic is quite interesting—privacy is not about being transparent, but about maintaining order. Excessive openness can harm business decisions, while excessive secrecy undermines institutional trust. A truly mature financial system must be able to precisely determine "who, when, under what conditions, has the right to see which data." This is not just a slogan; behind it is a complex set of execution logic. Dusk embeds this logic into its underlying architecture, rather than leaving it to upper-layer applications to patch together temporarily.

This also determines the nature of the Dusk ecosystem—it will not pursue disorderly expansion. Any financial application running on it must follow the same set of underlying constraints. In the short term, this may limit "freedom," but in the long term, these constraints are the foundation that makes the system trustworthy, controllable, and sustainable.

DUSK31,3%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LayerZeroHero

· 5h ago

Order is greater than speed, this perspective is indeed well understood. To be honest, many projects in the crypto space shout about TPS loudly, but they reveal their true nature when it comes to financial scenarios. Dusk's approach is quite interesting; cryptography redefines the rules rather than overturning them. It sounds like a restriction, but in fact, it is about building trust.

View OriginalReply0

RuntimeError

· 8h ago

Oh, I thought it was another L1 bragging about their TPS being able to beat the world in seconds. It seems that the folks at Dusk have indeed thought this through. A true financial system values order, not just how high you can brag about your TPS. I like the idea of redefining rules through cryptography; it's much more reliable than projects that want to overturn everything. Balancing privacy and transparency sounds simple, but in reality, that's the key point. Many L2s haven't figured this out. Constraints are actually an advantage? This shift in thinking definitely takes time; most people are still dreaming of absolute freedom. So, Dusk won't experience explosive growth, but surviving long-term is the real key.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedAgain

· 8h ago

Sounds reasonable, but how to make money in the short term is a problem. --- Orderliness is good, but can this design withstand extreme market conditions? I'm worried that the liquidation price might be set too tightly again. --- If only I had known earlier, I would have been fooled into going all-in by those TPS tricks back then. Now I find Dusk's approach somewhat more comfortable. --- Alright, another project aiming to redefine financial order. In the end, it still depends on whether the actual implementation can hold up. --- This logic sounds like risk control at first glance, but it might become its ceiling. Who would want to be tightly constrained by the underlying layer? --- Cryptography redefines the rules... sounds advanced, but it all depends on how the risk exposure is set; otherwise, it could lead to liquidation from over-leverage. --- Haha, balancing privacy and transparency is indeed something no one has mastered yet. Let's wait until it launches to see how the liquidation mechanism works.

View OriginalReply0

MaticHoleFiller

· 8h ago

Order > Performance, I agree with this. Many Web3 projects just can't settle down and want to harvest quickly; Dusk's approach actually seems more clear-headed. --- Cryptography redefines the rules. It sounds simple, but actually implementing it is very difficult. It all depends on whether trust can truly be embedded into the code. --- The balance between privacy and transparency is indeed stuck here... Excessive openness damages decision-making, excessive secrecy damages trust. Who should control this balance? --- Hardcoding this logic into the underlying architecture may indeed be criticized for limiting freedom in the short term, but this is exactly what a financial-grade system should look like. --- I think the most crucial point is not pursuing disorderly expansion. There are too many projects in the crypto space that operate in reverse, resulting in a collapsed ecosystem. --- Frankly, it still comes down to establishing a trust structure equivalent to traditional finance, just in a different way. This is much more reliable than simply piling up performance metrics.

View OriginalReply0

SignatureAnxiety

· 8h ago

Order is more valuable than speed, a fresh perspective --- Another project hyped up to the sky, let's wait and see the follow-up --- Cryptography redefines the rules, not the old "code is law" approach, it's okay --- Rigid rules limit flexibility, which is indeed uncomfortable in the short term --- Regarding precise privacy control permissions, it sounds good but how to implement it --- I just want to know if Dusk has ever achieved any collaborations in real-world finance --- Not pursuing disorderly expansion means not pursuing ecosystem explosion; this logic is a bit paradoxical --- Finally, someone understands that rules are more valuable than performance --- Trust structure > TPS, this overturns many people's perceptions --- The underlying architecture hardcodes rules, how can upper-layer applications innovate?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityOracle

· 8h ago

Order is greater than flair; that's a fresh perspective. How many projects are still showing off TPS every day? The real financial game is about building trust structures, and Dusk has understood this. Balancing privacy and transparency is difficult, but this is what professionalism looks like. Constraints equal freedom; in the long run, that's indeed the case. There are so many rules in reality; why should blockchain go against them? That's reasonable. This approach is much more reliable than those radical factions, but can the ecosystem gain momentum? Changing rules through code is easy; maintaining order is difficult.

View OriginalReply0

AllTalkLongTrader

· 8h ago

That's right, stop obsessing over TPS numbers all day long. Truly sustainable financial products rely on trust and order. Dusk's approach is interesting; it's not about destroying rules but rebuilding them with cryptography, which is the right way. Privacy and transparency need to be balanced; being too flashy or radical might scare people away. Rules may be uncomfortable in the short term, but they are the long-term moat. --- Not many blockchain projects follow this approach; most are still chasing hot trends. --- How is the execution logic of this underlying architecture written? Is it open source? Worth a look. --- Finally, someone clarified: it's not about speed or size, but about who can survive steadily. --- The problem is that most ecosystems are still expanding chaotically; Dusk's restraint makes it stand out as different. --- I agree with the idea that a strong order system is better than just code; finance inherently needs boundaries.

View OriginalReply0