In the rapidly heating Web3 RWA (Real World Assets) track, a clear contradiction is staring us in the face—most projects either stubbornly cling to privacy and ignore compliance reviews, or sacrifice data security to obtain regulatory approval. Neither approach is thorough enough.
Dusk Network, however, approaches the problem from a different angle, finding a breakthrough with its "Privacy + Compliance Dual-Drive" positioning. Especially in financial applications, it is becoming a key gateway for institutional-level solutions.
**The Art of Balancing Privacy and Auditing**
Speaking of Dusk's competitiveness, its core lies in bridging the seemingly opposing needs of "privacy protection" and "regulatory compliance." This Layer1 blockchain was designed from the ground up for regulated financial markets.
How is this achieved technically? It uses PLONK zero-knowledge proof technology as its foundation, combined with its self-developed Phoenix transaction model and Zedger hybrid privacy scheme. What’s the effect? Transaction data can remain confidential and unpeeked, yet still be auditable and verifiable—users can disclose whatever information they want, achieving compliance verification while protecting their core financial data.
A key feature here is the Confidential Smart Contract (XSC standard), which is natively supported by Dusk. For operations like digital securities issuance and clearing settlement, it provides a secure privacy execution environment. Most public chains cannot achieve this level of financial functionality.
**A New Pace of Performance Upgrades**
By the end of 2025, Dusk will switch from its current consensus mechanism to PoS. This upgrade introduces an innovative Succinct Attestation Protocol, capable of reducing transaction finality time to seconds. The high efficiency demanded by financial scenarios means this upgrade will bring significant improvements.
Imagine operating on Dusk—completely private transfers, personal data tightly hidden. But what if someday you need to prove the legality of a transaction? The verification process can be completed, and compliance requirements met. Such flexibility is rare among current RWA projects.
**From Concept to Implementation**
Many RWA projects on the market are still in PPT or feature demonstration stages, while Dusk has already accumulated practical application experience. The difference may seem small, but for financial institutions that need real capital deployment, whether there is an actual usable network environment makes all the difference.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MemeKingNFT
· 2h ago
Dual-wheel drive sounds good, but you won't know if it works until you actually run on the mainnet.
This round of RWA is really shaking things up; PPT projects should just die if they deserve it.
Privacy compliance and dual benefits? It feels like wanting both the fish and the bear's paw... But if Dusk can really be implemented, I need to keep an eye on it.
Second-level confirmation is quite impressive; finance definitely benefits from this setup.
I've always said that in this track, it's about who can actually use it, not who raises more funding.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptcyArtist
· 2h ago
Can privacy and compliance be achieved at the same time? It sounds like a pipe dream... But Dusk's approach is indeed quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamer
· 2h ago
Can privacy and compliance coexist? This is the right way, while other projects are wavering back and forth.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_Liquidated
· 3h ago
Can privacy and compliance truly be both achieved simultaneously, or does it just sound good?
In the rapidly heating Web3 RWA (Real World Assets) track, a clear contradiction is staring us in the face—most projects either stubbornly cling to privacy and ignore compliance reviews, or sacrifice data security to obtain regulatory approval. Neither approach is thorough enough.
Dusk Network, however, approaches the problem from a different angle, finding a breakthrough with its "Privacy + Compliance Dual-Drive" positioning. Especially in financial applications, it is becoming a key gateway for institutional-level solutions.
**The Art of Balancing Privacy and Auditing**
Speaking of Dusk's competitiveness, its core lies in bridging the seemingly opposing needs of "privacy protection" and "regulatory compliance." This Layer1 blockchain was designed from the ground up for regulated financial markets.
How is this achieved technically? It uses PLONK zero-knowledge proof technology as its foundation, combined with its self-developed Phoenix transaction model and Zedger hybrid privacy scheme. What’s the effect? Transaction data can remain confidential and unpeeked, yet still be auditable and verifiable—users can disclose whatever information they want, achieving compliance verification while protecting their core financial data.
A key feature here is the Confidential Smart Contract (XSC standard), which is natively supported by Dusk. For operations like digital securities issuance and clearing settlement, it provides a secure privacy execution environment. Most public chains cannot achieve this level of financial functionality.
**A New Pace of Performance Upgrades**
By the end of 2025, Dusk will switch from its current consensus mechanism to PoS. This upgrade introduces an innovative Succinct Attestation Protocol, capable of reducing transaction finality time to seconds. The high efficiency demanded by financial scenarios means this upgrade will bring significant improvements.
Imagine operating on Dusk—completely private transfers, personal data tightly hidden. But what if someday you need to prove the legality of a transaction? The verification process can be completed, and compliance requirements met. Such flexibility is rare among current RWA projects.
**From Concept to Implementation**
Many RWA projects on the market are still in PPT or feature demonstration stages, while Dusk has already accumulated practical application experience. The difference may seem small, but for financial institutions that need real capital deployment, whether there is an actual usable network environment makes all the difference.