I'm really into contributing to and refining Grokipedia. There's something satisfying about being part of building out the knowledge base for the community—catching gaps, improving existing entries, watching it evolve. It's the kind of hands-on involvement that makes a real difference in how accessible crypto education becomes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-9ad11037
· 18h ago
Grokipedia is really addictive. Fixing bugs while watching the knowledge base grow gives a pretty good sense of achievement.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 18h ago
I'm also working on grokipedia, but to be honest, sometimes it feels like filling a bottomless pit... But it definitely gives that sense of participation.
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplant
· 18h ago
ngl Gropedia is really addictive; I keep editing it and just can't stop.
View OriginalReply0
APY追逐者
· 18h ago
Wow, this is the true community spirit, not the kind of bragging.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAO
· 18h ago
It seems there is enthusiasm, but I've seen this logic in many DAOs... many contributors, little actual governance power, and in the end, they all become workers. How does Grokipedia motivate these people to stay engaged long-term? If you haven't thought it through, it's just a castle in the air.
I'm really into contributing to and refining Grokipedia. There's something satisfying about being part of building out the knowledge base for the community—catching gaps, improving existing entries, watching it evolve. It's the kind of hands-on involvement that makes a real difference in how accessible crypto education becomes.