Having used Filecoin, the conclusion is quite straightforward: decentralized storage can indeed work, but for developers, the entry barrier and subsequent maintenance are quite challenging.
Walrus took a different approach. Instead of starting from theory, it is directly tailored for Blob data and application layers, seamlessly integrating with the Sui ecosystem. This design philosophy makes a significant difference.
The real concern lies in practical use cases: AI training data storage, on-chain historical records, Web frontend deployment—how easy it is to use and whether it can run stably in these scenarios are far more valuable than just shouting about architectural concepts. No one wants to tinker with underlying issues every day; ease of use is the key.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonBoi42
· 4h ago
Filecoin's approach is indeed complicated, I've been through it too. Walrus's idea, honestly, is much smoother for the Sui ecosystem.
Practicality is the hard truth; don't just pile up concepts.
I'm a bit interested in trying Walrus's AI data storage solution, sounds pretty good?
Walrus seems to really have hit the nail on the head; Filecoin is overthinking it.
Decentralized storage has been talked about for so many years, but usability is the most important.
The real difference lies in ease of use, and this time Walrus got it right.
I don't want to struggle with underlying issues every day; I can accept Walrus's approach.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 5h ago
Basically, Filecoin is just a fancy theoretical show, ultimately falling into the hands of developers. Walrus has taken a pragmatic approach this time, I prefer the bottom-up application layer logic over those who constantly shout about architectural revolutions.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 5h ago
The veteran's supply line must be stable; just shouting theories is useless. I saw the battle of Filecoin; it was lost due to engineering details. I recognize Walrus's approach; addressing the pain points directly is more appealing than making empty promises.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter
· 5h ago
To be honest, the Filecoin system is really too complicated. I gave up after trying it once.
I like the approach of Walrus; just get the work done without talking nonsense.
It still depends on whether it can be truly used; don't bother with those superficial things.
Having used Filecoin, the conclusion is quite straightforward: decentralized storage can indeed work, but for developers, the entry barrier and subsequent maintenance are quite challenging.
Walrus took a different approach. Instead of starting from theory, it is directly tailored for Blob data and application layers, seamlessly integrating with the Sui ecosystem. This design philosophy makes a significant difference.
The real concern lies in practical use cases: AI training data storage, on-chain historical records, Web frontend deployment—how easy it is to use and whether it can run stably in these scenarios are far more valuable than just shouting about architectural concepts. No one wants to tinker with underlying issues every day; ease of use is the key.