As a large amount of institutional funds continuously flow onto the chain due to ETFs, many people focus on short-term price fluctuations. But if you want to see the true opportunity clearly, you need to change your perspective.
Take DUSK as an example. Its value doesn't fundamentally depend on how many of these inflows will directly buy its tokens. Honestly, the probability is zero. The key question is: what proportion of this continuous hundreds-of-billions capital inflow will ultimately generate demand for the "compliant privacy financial layer"? That is what DUSK is truly waiting for.
So how can we judge whether this will happen? Don't look at the token price—look at three specific signals:
**Ecology**: Will there be asset management protocols based on DUSK that specifically serve institutional clients? This is a hard indicator.
**Partnership developments**: Have traditional asset service providers or major custodial banks started seriously researching integration with its privacy solutions? This means institutions are genuinely considering using it.
**On-chain evidence**: The most truthful indicator—large transfers on the network. If these are regular, non-speculative flows of privacy assets, then that’s genuine demand.
The certainty brought by Bitcoin ETFs to the crypto world is unprecedented. Projects like DUSK stand at the point where this certainty points, building the key infrastructure for the next phase. Frankly, this is a game of patience. The bet is: once Wall Street’s money fully adapts to on-chain gameplay, which protocol will they choose to handle their most core and confidential assets? The answer is very likely right here.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SybilAttackVictim
· 8h ago
This logic is quite interesting, but to be honest, it's still a gamble on DUSK becoming the privacy finance layer. The question is, when will this thing actually be recognized by institutions?
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 12h ago
Honestly, those who look at short-term coin prices have been cut off. This guy is right, it depends on whether institutions will really use the privacy layer.
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketman
· 12h ago
Seized, this is the essence of the launch window — it's not about the rise and fall of the coin price, but waiting for the fuel to be fully topped up.
Once large-scale privacy flows show regularity, it signals an RSI breakthrough into the stratosphere; ultimately, Wall Street's money will land on a certain protocol.
DUSK is still gathering strength below the lower band of the Bollinger Bands; the true escape velocity has not yet arrived.
Three-layer verification through ecological protocols, bank cooperation, and on-chain evidence — this is what scientific orbital prediction looks like, not just armchair strategizing.
Once regulatory compliance needs are ignited, these talents will understand what gravitational acceleration really means.
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlock
· 12h ago
Alright, the logic sounds pretty good, but it depends on whether DUSK can truly attract institutional privacy needs; otherwise, it's just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 13h ago
Yeah, that's right. The key is whether the ecosystem truly takes off; just the coin price soaring is useless.
In the end, Wall Street folks have to put their real money into a certain protocol. Whether DUSK can become that place is the real gamble.
But to be honest, on-chain data can't be fooled. I only believe it when I see large private transactions moving.
As a large amount of institutional funds continuously flow onto the chain due to ETFs, many people focus on short-term price fluctuations. But if you want to see the true opportunity clearly, you need to change your perspective.
Take DUSK as an example. Its value doesn't fundamentally depend on how many of these inflows will directly buy its tokens. Honestly, the probability is zero. The key question is: what proportion of this continuous hundreds-of-billions capital inflow will ultimately generate demand for the "compliant privacy financial layer"? That is what DUSK is truly waiting for.
So how can we judge whether this will happen? Don't look at the token price—look at three specific signals:
**Ecology**: Will there be asset management protocols based on DUSK that specifically serve institutional clients? This is a hard indicator.
**Partnership developments**: Have traditional asset service providers or major custodial banks started seriously researching integration with its privacy solutions? This means institutions are genuinely considering using it.
**On-chain evidence**: The most truthful indicator—large transfers on the network. If these are regular, non-speculative flows of privacy assets, then that’s genuine demand.
The certainty brought by Bitcoin ETFs to the crypto world is unprecedented. Projects like DUSK stand at the point where this certainty points, building the key infrastructure for the next phase. Frankly, this is a game of patience. The bet is: once Wall Street’s money fully adapts to on-chain gameplay, which protocol will they choose to handle their most core and confidential assets? The answer is very likely right here.