During the fundraising period, failing to reach the target amount or being oversubscribed due to excessive enthusiasm are both extreme warning signs of risk. On the surface, it may seem like a matter of investor apathy or enthusiasm, but the underlying logic is more troubling — the project team hasn't even managed basic financial arrangements. If a project is unwilling to invest its own funds to support itself, why should people believe it has genuine execution capability? Such "chain failures" in the fundraising process often indicate potential issues in subsequent development, operations, and even ecosystem construction.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SorryRugPulled
· 4h ago
Raising less than the target or oversubscription? Basically, it means the project team itself lacks confidence. I've seen this too many times.
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRiches
· 4h ago
Actually, oversubscription isn't necessarily a good thing; it can make things more anxious.
View OriginalReply0
GovernancePretender
· 4h ago
Failing to raise funds or oversubscription are both red flags, indicating that the project team hasn't figured things out themselves.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsShaman
· 4h ago
Failing to raise funds or oversubscription are all red flags. Basically, it means the project team itself lacks confidence. Truly solid projects have long since secured internal backing to fill the gaps, and these kinds of issues don't happen with them.
View OriginalReply0
DegenRecoveryGroup
· 4h ago
Fundraising is either lukewarm or booming; frankly, it's all because the project teams are uncertain themselves.
---
Over-raising is just as heartbreaking as under-raising. Those who are truly confident should have already invested their own money.
---
This logic makes sense—if fundraising can fail, then how will things proceed later?
---
Projects that haven't even planned their fundraising properly—what are they expecting?
---
Problems on both ends—what does that indicate? The project teams don't even believe in themselves.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoDouble-O-Seven
· 4h ago
Really, fundraising is extremely unpredictable—either dead silence or a huge hit. Even the project teams don't dare to bet on themselves, so how can we expect them to be reliable? If they mess up the fundraising stage, what else can we expect afterward...
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 4h ago
Public offering data instantly reveals whether the project team is trustworthy; cracking the code is that simple.
During the fundraising period, failing to reach the target amount or being oversubscribed due to excessive enthusiasm are both extreme warning signs of risk. On the surface, it may seem like a matter of investor apathy or enthusiasm, but the underlying logic is more troubling — the project team hasn't even managed basic financial arrangements. If a project is unwilling to invest its own funds to support itself, why should people believe it has genuine execution capability? Such "chain failures" in the fundraising process often indicate potential issues in subsequent development, operations, and even ecosystem construction.