Distributed storage is a competitive track, and Walrus's approach is indeed a bit different. Instead of simply piling on security features, it balances the three conflicting needs of security, cost, and speed. It may look complicated, but in practice, its advantages are very clear.



First, let's talk about erasure coding technology, which is Walrus's killer feature. The traditional approach is to replicate files multiple times across different nodes, which sounds secure but is actually a money-burning activity—both space-consuming and inefficient. Walrus has a different idea: it splits files into multiple fragments, so even if some fragments are lost, the original file can be fully restored through mathematical algorithms. Security is uncompromised, but costs and efficiency are significantly improved.

Next, regarding its integration with the Sui network, this layered architecture is quite ingenious. Sui handles data ownership management and integrity verification, acting as a central controller; Walrus's own distributed network is responsible for actual storage. Each plays its role without interference, making expansion much more flexible, and the overall system's security and transparency are maximized.

Finally, on cost-performance ratio, speed and cost truly achieve a win-win situation. With the support of the previous two technologies, comparing Walrus to old competitors like Filecoin and Arweave, it either offers faster read/write speeds or significantly cheaper long-term storage. Especially in scenarios requiring frequent file access, Walrus's advantages become evident. If you're looking for a storage solution that balances performance and cost, Walrus is definitely worth a deeper look.
FIL2,43%
AR0,17%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SelfMadeRuggeevip
· 18h ago
Erasure coding really packs a punch; compared to brute-force copying of files, it saves a lot of costs.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeGazervip
· 18h ago
Erasure coding is indeed powerful, saving money without dropping the ball, and much more reliable than those block-like copies.
View OriginalReply0
TommyTeachervip
· 19h ago
The erasure coding method is indeed excellent, saving much more cost than copying and pasting.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologisvip
· 19h ago
The mathematical art of erasure coding reminds me of the fault-tolerance mechanisms of early digital archives—in a sense, Walrus has evolved storage from "redundant stacking" to "elegant coding." Compared to the crude approach of Filecoin, there is indeed a difference in cultural taste.
View OriginalReply0
HashRateHermitvip
· 19h ago
Erasure coding is indeed powerful, much smarter than the naive replication like Filecoin.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)