Head exchanges have always adopted a horse racing mechanism, where subsequent investments are linked to project performance—this logic is actually quite clear. Resources are tilted toward high-quality projects, and poor-quality projects naturally drop out, allowing market screening to occur naturally. In simple terms, those who can stand out and have more impressive data will receive key support. This approach may seem harsh, but it is actually very beneficial to the entire ecosystem. Project teams are motivated to innovate, which makes the ecosystem increasingly rich, forming a virtuous cycle. The more diverse the ecosystem, the more vibrant it becomes, and the ecosystem continues to flourish.