I've learned to be skeptical of any pre-launch or ICO project that relies heavily on paid promotions. If a product truly has merit, you'll see genuine excitement spreading organically across the community—people naturally share and discuss what they actually believe in. When you have to pay for visibility, it often signals the opposite. The real signal isn't the hype machine; it's whether real users and builders are talking about it unprompted.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ThesisInvestor
· 4h ago
Really, I directly pass on projects that spend big money on advertising. Community-driven discussions are the real indicator.
View OriginalReply0
AirDropMissed
· 5h ago
Really, I now directly pass on projects that spend money on promotion. I've seen too many of these get-rich-quick schemes.
View OriginalReply0
VCsSuckMyLiquidity
· 5h ago
With so many paid promos, truly valuable projects would have spread on their own long ago. Do they still need to spend money to buy hype? Clearly, there's nothing substantial.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 5h ago
The more aggressive the paid promotion of a project, the more I run away. What does that mean? It just shows that no one is genuinely willing to pay.
I've learned to be skeptical of any pre-launch or ICO project that relies heavily on paid promotions. If a product truly has merit, you'll see genuine excitement spreading organically across the community—people naturally share and discuss what they actually believe in. When you have to pay for visibility, it often signals the opposite. The real signal isn't the hype machine; it's whether real users and builders are talking about it unprompted.