What are the core challenges faced by traditional financial institutions going on-chain? Most blockchain solutions adopt a monolithic architecture, coupling consensus, privacy, asset onboarding, compliance auditing, and other functions together. The result is—banks have to accept everything, hedge funds have to accept everything too, and there’s no room for differentiated treatment. This means institutions must bear huge technical adaptation costs, forcibly accept a bunch of redundant features they don’t need, not to mention meeting their own specific compliance requirements.



Dusk took a different approach. It redesigned the underlying logic of financial blockchains—modular architecture, with the core idea summarized in eight words: split as needed, combine flexibly.

How exactly is it split? Dusk breaks down the financial blockchain into six independent modules: consensus module (SBA mechanism), privacy computing module (zero-knowledge proofs), asset mapping module (onboarding real-world assets), compliance audit module (regulatory traceability), fund custody module (off-chain custody), and transaction execution module (efficient clearing). Each module has standardized interfaces. What does this mean? Institutions can choose which modules they need.

Two examples make this clear. If a bank only cares about tokenizing credit assets, it can connect to the asset mapping and fund custody modules—just these two. What about hedge funds? They want to protect the confidentiality of their trading strategies, so they add an extra privacy computing module. Different institutions, different combinations. This flexibility completely breaks the deadlock of the traditional monolithic "one-size-fits-all" architecture.

But that’s not enough. Splitting into modules is easy; coordinating between modules is difficult. Traditional modular solutions often get stuck here—slow data exchange between modules, poor compatibility. Dusk’s solution is an built-in module coordination engine that enables efficient data flow across modules. Simply put, each module is like a different musician in an orchestra, and the coordination engine is the conductor, ensuring everyone stays in sync and works seamlessly together.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ZenChainWalkervip
· 9h ago
Modularization sounds good, but the key is to run smoothly without lag.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainGrillervip
· 9h ago
Now someone finally thought of the real pain points of financial institutions—it's not necessary for all chains to follow the same package.
View OriginalReply0
OvertimeSquidvip
· 9h ago
Oh wait, this modular architecture sounds promising. Finally, someone is seriously fixing this mess.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreathervip
· 9h ago
It sounds like Dusk's modular design indeed addresses many pain points, but the key still depends on execution capability—don't become just a PPT coin again.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWhisperervip
· 9h ago
This modular approach is indeed much more reliable than a one-size-fits-all solution, but to be honest, I still have some doubts about the collaboration engine... Can it truly achieve seamless cooperation?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseMigrantvip
· 10h ago
Hey, wait a minute. Can the modular architecture really solve the pain points of traditional financial institutions? It still seems to depend on the actual implementation results.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)