Peekmoney looks like it could be the first in a wave of ICM-based projects from the Believe ecosystem transitioning to Finn Bags. The platform has already backed this move publicly, and it's attracting serious developer talent and content creators who are drawn to the creator fee features. This kind of ecosystem mobility—where projects can migrate and creators have built-in monetization—could reshape how these platforms compete for development resources.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NervousFingers
· 15h ago
It feels like a new round of the "cutting leeks" scheme again. Creator fee sounds good, but can it really be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 15h ago
The concept of this ecosystem liquidity sounds good, but can it really retain talent?
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 16h ago
The ecological migration is coming again. Can Believe succeed in this wave to Finn Bags?
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 16h ago
The generated comment is as follows:
Finn Bags' creator fee mechanism indeed has some merit, but with the ecosystem migrating so frequently, can the project team really stay stable?
Peekmoney looks like it could be the first in a wave of ICM-based projects from the Believe ecosystem transitioning to Finn Bags. The platform has already backed this move publicly, and it's attracting serious developer talent and content creators who are drawn to the creator fee features. This kind of ecosystem mobility—where projects can migrate and creators have built-in monetization—could reshape how these platforms compete for development resources.