2026-01-13 21:31:21

It's striking how the push to prevent public officials from profiting through crypto-related business interests has become a flashpoint that could derail market structure legislation. The irony runs deep: ethical guardrails designed to prevent conflicts of interest are themselves becoming obstacles to regulatory frameworks. Whether intentional or not, this dynamic exposes the tension between integrity standards and legislative progress in the crypto space.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

APY_Chaser

· 3h ago

Wow, this is a typical case of "stifling development in the name of anti-corruption"... Honestly, it's the regulatory authorities not understanding what they really want.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 3h ago

So, fighting corruption has caused problems? That's some logic...

View OriginalReply0

DarkPoolWatcher

· 3h ago

Ha, this is outrageous. The measures meant to prevent corruption ended up choking the industry. Full of irony... Moral standards have become legislative stumbling blocks, who would have thought? Public officials are not allowed to engage in crypto business, which is originally fine, but it ends up paralyzing the regulatory framework, a textbook case. So, the crypto market is just a big stage, where integrity and progress are forcibly at odds, hilarious. If you ask me, instead of trying to prevent this or that, it's better to loosen up and let the market breathe on its own.

View OriginalReply0