When I'm looking at upside breakouts, I use absolute price targets—basically taking the pattern depth and projecting it straight up in hard numbers. For downside moves though, it's different: I work with percentage changes instead, extending the pattern depth downward in percentage terms.

The interesting part? Both approaches actually deliver conservative results. They're not some moonshot prediction system; they're designed to give you realistic, actionable targets. It's about matching your calculation method to the direction of the break—let the market structure guide your math, not the other way around.