2026-01-13 10:35:10

When it comes to on-chain technology, most people first think of the software layer. But large-scale adoption requires a deeper foundation. If hardware itself cannot be trusted, everything built on top of it is just guesswork. This is precisely why hardware layer integration becomes crucial—it is not only about technical feasibility but also directly impacts the security and reliability of the entire ecosystem. Without hardware-level trust guarantees, even the most excellent software design will struggle to achieve true decentralized applications and widespread adoption.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseHermit

· 23h ago

Hardware trust has indeed been neglected for too long. Everyone is focused on trading coins and writing contracts, but no one truly cares whether the underlying hardware is reliable. That's right, no matter how advanced the software is, if the hardware is poor, it's all for nothing. Suddenly I remember, those hardware wallet manufacturers have already been benefiting from this wave of opportunity... Hardware-level trust sounds impressive, but how does it actually get implemented? Can you explain the specific approach? That's why I still have reservations about most Layer2 solutions. Without hardware-level endorsement, they are ultimately not secure enough.

View OriginalReply0

UnruggableChad

· 01-15 07:45

Hardware trust has indeed been overlooked. Everyone is focused on the code, but little do they realize that if the foundation is crooked, no matter how impressive the building above is, it's all in vain.

View OriginalReply0

DataChief

· 01-14 20:45

That's right, I've always felt that our circle is too focused on software innovation, while hardware is being overlooked. Without reliable hardware backing, no matter how fancy the on-chain features are, it's all in vain.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWhisperer

· 01-13 11:04

Hardware trust has indeed been neglected for too long, everyone is hyping software concepts... But we have to admit, even the best code is useless if it runs on black-box hardware.

View OriginalReply0

DecentralizedElder

· 01-13 11:03

Hardware trust has indeed been neglected for too long. Everyone is focused on gas fees and contract audits, but without a solid foundation, everything is just empty.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiLeftOnRead

· 01-13 11:03

Hardware trust has indeed been seriously underestimated. Everyone is talking about software innovation, but no one cares whether the underlying layer is truly reliable...

View OriginalReply0

SelfRugger

· 01-13 10:57

Hardware trust has indeed been underestimated. Everyone is focusing on software innovation, but they don't realize that the foundation is unstable.

View OriginalReply0

TxFailed

· 01-13 10:55

yeah so... learned this the hard way when my hardware wallet decided to ghost me mid-transaction. turns out everyone's obsessed with sexy smart contracts but nobody talks about the actual trust layer underneath. technically speaking, it's all theater without proper hardware guarantees. classic mistake of the ecosystem ngl

Reply0

NFT_Therapy_Group

· 01-13 10:53

Hardware trust has indeed been underestimated. Everyone is talking about software innovation, but little do they realize that if the foundation is rotten, how can a building be constructed?

View OriginalReply0

BackrowObserver

· 01-13 10:52

Hardware trust has indeed been overlooked, everyone is focused on smart contracts... To put it simply, without hardware assurance, it's just a paper tiger. No wonder large-scale applications haven't taken off. This perspective is worth considering.

View OriginalReply0