White House Targets July 4 for Landmark Crypto Regulation Bill

The White House's top crypto adviser, Patrick Witt, set a July 4 deadline for passing broad crypto legislation into law, as the legislative window continues to narrow. Speaking Wednesday at the Consensus conference in Miami, Witt, executive director of the President's Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, stated that the Senate could advance the legislation in June, allowing sufficient time for the House to reconcile and pass its version.

Legislative Timeline and Strategy

Witt expressed confidence in the accelerated timeline, stating "We're targeting July 4. I think that would be a tremendous birthday present for America, celebrating our 250th." The House passed its version of the crypto bill last year and would need to reconcile it with whatever the Senate produces.

The Senate Banking Committee could decide to hold a hearing to amend and vote on the bill as early as next week, according to the article.

Federal Regulation Framework

Over the past year, the Senate has been advancing a bill that seeks to regulate the crypto industry at the federal level for the first time. The legislation proposes dividing regulatory jurisdiction between the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Stablecoin Rewards Compromise

The main sticking point in the Senate Banking Committee has centered on the treatment of stablecoin rewards. Compromise language was released last week and has seemingly resolved this issue, though bank trade groups have argued that it "falls short" of their expectations.

Ethics Concerns Over Trump Family Crypto Connections

A new obstacle has emerged: ethics concerns raised by Senate Democrats regarding President Donald Trump and his family's crypto connections. According to Bloomberg estimates cited in the source, these connections have brought in approximately $1.4 billion. Both Trump and his wife, Melania Trump, launched memecoins ahead of the inauguration, and the Trump family has led the DeFi and stablecoin project World Liberty Financial.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., a prominent voice on the crypto bill, stated at Consensus in Miami that there would be no support for the bill without an ethics provision.

Ongoing Negotiations on Ethics Language

On Wednesday, Witt reported that discussions with Democrats have been positive recently. He noted that Democrats have been consistent in stating that ethics language cannot target "anyone's family, any one particular politician."

"I think we're getting a lot closer to a compromise on that, and I'm optimistic that we're going to be able to close that out as well," Witt said.

When pressed about whether ethics language would include the president, Witt clarified that rules would apply equally across all levels: "When pressed about language, including the president, Witt said the rules would apply to the president and the new intern working on Capitol Hill." He further stated: "I think it's not really so much the President, this President, the Office of the President. It is if you're applying rules that you're only trying to single out one particular office holder or one particular individual, that is not something we are going to entertain."

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third-party sources and is for reference only. It does not represent the views or opinions of Gate and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Virtual asset trading involves high risk. Please do not rely solely on the information on this page when making decisions. For details, see the Disclaimer.
Comment
0/400
FlamingoFrontViewvip
· 05-07 17:52
The details of the U.S. Marshals case haven't been fully disclosed yet; waiting for the investigation report.
View OriginalReply0
NodeUnderTheAuroravip
· 05-07 07:14
At the end of the day, the government playing with crypto must also follow industry best practices; there are no privileges.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ebdc7d3avip
· 05-07 05:24
The incident on the Marshals side indicates that the custody solution needs to be redesigned; it's not just a matter of switching to a different wallet.
View OriginalReply0
OrigamiVolcanovip
· 05-07 05:20
enhanced safeguarding = More audits and multi-signature support
View OriginalReply0
SecondaryMarketDesertervip
· 05-07 05:17
Just don't turn it into excessive regulation; finding the right balance is difficult.
View OriginalReply0
MetalFrameBookPageCrossvip
· 05-07 05:15
It was long overdue for an upgrade; federal agencies' security awareness is still stuck in 2017.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropsAfterTheTideRecedesvip
· 05-07 05:08
The federal holdings are not small, and being hacked once results in treasury losses. Taking it seriously is the right approach.
View OriginalReply0
OvernightPositionPhobiavip
· 05-07 05:08
Witt's words sound like he's about to promote a new compliance framework? Let's wait and see.
View OriginalReply0