
Fixed supply refers to a cryptocurrency or token whose total issuance is capped. The maximum number of units that can ever be created is written into the asset’s rules or smart contract. Once this upper limit is reached, no further tokens will be minted. There are two common approaches: Bitcoin sets a hard cap of 21 million coins, released gradually following a “halving” schedule; XRP, by contrast, was pre-minted in full (100 billion tokens), then distributed over time through escrow and scheduled releases.
Fixed supply directly impacts scarcity, inflation rate, and long-term valuation. It also influences how a project manages rewards, market making, and unlock schedules.
Fixed supply defines the boundaries of scarcity for a token, providing a buffer against dilution from additional issuance.
From an investment perspective, it helps you distinguish whether price movements are driven by changes in supply or pure demand shifts. For example, with Bitcoin’s capped supply and predictable annual issuance, price is mainly influenced by demand and macro liquidity factors.
When participating in project activities, fixed supply clarifies the sources and sustainability of rewards. If the total supply cannot increase, rewards typically come from fee distribution, reserve releases, or buyback and burn mechanisms—not perpetual minting. For newcomers, understanding supply limits can help avoid mistaking “unlock events” for new issuance and reduce misjudgment risks.
Fixed supply is enforced by issuance rules and smart contracts—not by informal promises.
Take Bitcoin: its total supply of 21 million is hard-coded in the protocol. Block rewards halve roughly every four years: from 50 → 25 → 12.5 → 6.25 → 3.125 coins per block, until almost all coins have been mined. The cap never changes, but new issuance slows dramatically over time.
For pre-minted tokens like XRP, the full supply is generated at once and then gradually released via escrow schedules. While the overall supply remains fixed, circulating supply increases as tokens are unlocked—often leading people to confuse “unlocking” with “minting.”
Burn mechanisms often coexist with fixed supply models. For example, BNB aims to reduce its circulating supply to 100 million through quarterly token burns. Burning means permanently removing tokens from circulation—similar to “voiding tickets”—ensuring they never return.
It’s important to distinguish between maximum supply and circulating supply. Maximum supply is the hard cap; circulating supply is the amount currently available for trading in the market. These figures do not always change in sync.
Fixed supply manifests in different ways across various scenarios.
In spot markets, tokens like BTC, ADA, and XRP display both “max supply” and “circulating supply” on their project info pages. On Gate exchange, users can view these metrics to assess scarcity and potential sell pressure.
In DeFi and yield products, if reward tokens themselves have a fixed supply, rewards typically come from fee sharing or reserve allocations instead of new issuance. For example, some liquidity mining or savings events on Gate specify “rewards sourced from project reserves,” meaning the supply boundary remains intact and activity sustainability depends more on fee volume and budget.
Within the NFT sector, fixed supply often refers to a collection’s “mint cap”—for example, a set of 10,000 profile pictures. This cap determines rarity and secondary market liquidity, but unlike tokens, NFTs lack block rewards or future minting pathways.
In derivatives and leveraged trading, fixed supply does not directly affect supply dynamics but amplifies the price impact of demand changes. Since supply is predictable, sentiment and capital flows play a greater role in driving price movements.
Step one: Check the maximum supply and current circulating supply. Lower caps and higher circulating ratios indicate stronger scarcity—but watch for concentration among holders.
Step two: Review release and unlock schedules. Fixed total supply does not mean all tokens are immediately tradable. Understand unlock timelines for teams, investors, and ecosystem funds to identify potential sell pressure windows.
Step three: Confirm burn or buyback rules. If a project has clear burn plans, long-term circulating supply may decline—check whether these rules are encoded in contracts or audited regularly.
Step four: Analyze holder concentration and address distribution. High concentration means that actions by a few addresses can significantly impact overall supply dynamics.
Step five: On Gate, consult project info pages and announcements. Pay attention to “Max Supply,” “Circulating Supply,” unlock details, event notes, trading depth, and reward sources to judge sustainability.
Recent data refers to 2025. In 2025, Bitcoin will add roughly 164,000 new coins throughout the year—an annualized issuance rate of about 0.8%, down sharply from the 328,000 new coins added in 2024 following the halving (a ~50% reduction). This highlights the predictable issuance path of fixed supply assets.
Market analysis for Q4 2025 shows that about 30% of the top 100 projects by market cap use a fixed cap or have a clearly stated target cap (per CoinGecko classification). This ratio has edged higher versus 2024 as more projects adopt sustainable models based on fee sharing and burning rather than continual inflation.
In the NFT space, new collections launched in the past six months have adopted more conservative mint caps—typically lowering from 10,000 down to a range of 5,000–10,000 units—reflecting rationalized market demand and team cost constraints. A hard cap helps establish scarcity expectations but requires robust ongoing operations to support floor prices.
Trading data for 2025 shows several days where spot and institutional buy volume exceeded Bitcoin’s daily new issuance (about 450 coins per day via block rewards). Under fixed supply conditions, such demand spikes have a direct impact on price.
Fixed supply means there is a hard upper limit on total issuance; new tokens approach zero over time or stop completely.
Inflationary models allow continuous minting with no strict cap or with a high cap and ongoing significant new issuance—some blockchains allocate annual inflation rewards to validators and stakers. The key difference is scarcity boundary and likelihood of dilution for holders.
From an investment standpoint, fixed-supply assets depend more on growing demand and utility cases for value appreciation; inflationary assets require assessing mint rates, whether fees offset dilution (via burning or buybacks), and if staking yields compensate for inflation risks. For beginners: first check if there’s a cap; then examine release and burn mechanisms—these shortcuts help build a sound evaluation framework.
Bitcoin’s creator Satoshi Nakamoto capped its supply at 21 million to address inflation caused by unlimited fiat money printing. Fixed supply makes Bitcoin scarce and supports its role as a store of value—similar to gold. This design philosophy stands in stark contrast to central bank-controlled fiat currencies that can be issued at will, attracting investors seeking value preservation.
No—the maximum number of coins is permanently encoded in the protocol and cannot be changed. For instance, even with broad network consensus, Bitcoin’s cap is extremely difficult to alter. Note that fixed supply ≠ fixed circulating supply; coins may be lost, burned, or remain inactive, so actual circulating coins may be fewer than theoretical max supply.
Fixed supply creates scarcity which supports long-term value potential. As demand grows while supply remains constant, prices tend to rise theoretically. However, prices are still influenced by market sentiment, utility, macroeconomics, and other factors; fixed supply is just one positive driver—not a guarantee of price appreciation.
Check the project’s open-source code and whitepaper for hard-coded supply limits. Review on-chain data using platforms like Gate to track historical issuance and real-time supply figures. Look for evidence of rule changes by the team or community feedback on transparency. Be cautious with projects promising fixed supply without enforcement at the code level.
Fixed supply limits project flexibility—it cannot incentivize ecosystem growth or respond to extreme events via new issuance. Lost or burned coins will steadily reduce liquidity over time. If utility declines while supply remains constant, prices may face persistent downward pressure.


