✍️ Gate 廣場「創作者認證激勵計劃」進行中!
我們歡迎優質創作者積極創作,申請認證
贏取豪華代幣獎池、Gate 精美周邊、流量曝光等超過 $10,000+ 豐厚獎勵!
立即報名 👉 https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
📕 認證申請步驟:
1️⃣ App 首頁底部進入【廣場】 → 點擊右上角頭像進入個人主頁
2️⃣ 點擊頭像右下角【申請認證】進入認證頁面,等待審核
讓優質內容被更多人看到,一起共建創作者社區!
活動詳情:https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
A small factory in Shandong that makes "old man's joy" vehicles sued Xiaomi Cars.
They claimed that Xiaomi SU7's headlights and bumpers resemble Porsche.
They demanded the cancellation of these appearance patents.
Court opened today. An ant fighting an elephant.
The "old man's joy" factory's reasoning is quite "direct":
Your design has minor modifications.
No innovation, no confusion.
Shouldn't monopolize it, should share it.
Xiaomi's side disagrees:
We invested billions, hired top teams.
The design was praised by Porsche as "kindred spirits in design."
You say it lacks innovation?
But both are secretly pleased:
If "old man's joy" wins, they can copy freely.
If they lose, they still get famous, traffic soars.
If Xiaomi wins, their patent becomes stronger.
If they lose, it actually proves the design is excellent, PR takes off.
Previously: If not endorsed by Porsche, you weren't top-tier.
Now: If not sued by "old man's joy," you're not truly top-tier.
Porsche: Shandong buddy, keep the competition going, I'm taking a break first.