Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Drift Protocol Appears to Receive $127.5 Million USDT Funding Injection After Exploit
Drift Protocol is reported to have received up to $127.5 million USDT from Tether to partially compensate affected users following the April 1 exploit on Solana
SOLUSD
.
This commitment will cover approximately 47% of the estimated stolen assets amounting to US$$270 million to US$$285 million. This support becomes one of the largest interventions by a stablecoin issuer after a DeFi security incident.
Tether Steps In After Largest DeFi Hack of 2026
The April 1 attack on Drift, the largest decentralized perpetual futures exchange on Solana, was not an ordinary smart contract exploit.
Blockchain analytics firm Elliptic linked this operation to actors connected to North Korea, who spent six months infiltrating the protocol’s inner circle.
The attacker disguised as a quantitative trading firm, built trust at conferences, then infiltrated devices via malicious TestFlight apps and vulnerabilities in VSCode.
They then manipulated Drift’s multisig approval using Solana’s durable nonce feature to drain the core vault containing USDC, SOL, and JLP tokens.
This incident reduced Drift’s total value locked from US$$550 million to around US$$230 million. Drift’s token (DRIFT) also dropped more than 30% shortly afterward.
Recovery Raises Moral Hazard Questions
Tether’s involvement indicates the increasing role of stablecoin issuers as a buffer for the ecosystem amid a major crisis.
However, this partial recovery also highlights ongoing operational security gaps, even in well-developed protocols.
Critics question whether external bailouts might create moral hazard by reducing incentives for protocols to invest in security.
Some also point out that Circle refused to freeze the stolen USDC during the attack, raising questions from on-chain investigators.
Circle argued that they did not freeze the stolen USDC because they can only act under legal orders, not on their own initiative.
“When Circle freezes USDC, it is not because we have decided, unilaterally or arbitrarily, that someone’s assets should be taken from them. It is because the law requires us to act,” wrote Circle’s CSO Dante Disparte in a blog.
The Drift team is still working with security firms SEAL 911 and OtterSec, as well as the Solana Foundation’s STRIDE initiative.
Full details regarding user claim schedules and compensation distribution mechanisms have not yet been disclosed.