OpenClaw Founder Peter Steinberger has stepped forward to address a recent community incident where a user faced suspension for making a Bitcoin mention in the project's Discord server. As reported by ChainCatcher, Steinberger clarified that the Discord community operates under strict governance policies, which members explicitly consent to when they join. The server maintains comprehensive restrictions on cryptocurrency-related discussions as part of its broader community guidelines.
Rather than dismissing the concern, Steinberger demonstrated openness by requesting the user's account details and committing to manually reinstate their access to the OpenClaw Discord group. This response highlights how Web3 communities navigate the balance between maintaining focused discussion spaces and preserving member inclusivity—even when a simple Bitcoin mention triggers automated moderation. The incident reflects broader questions about how project communities should moderate content while remaining welcoming to legitimate participants.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
OpenClaw Founder Peter Steinberger has stepped forward to address a recent community incident where a user faced suspension for making a Bitcoin mention in the project's Discord server. As reported by ChainCatcher, Steinberger clarified that the Discord community operates under strict governance policies, which members explicitly consent to when they join. The server maintains comprehensive restrictions on cryptocurrency-related discussions as part of its broader community guidelines.
Rather than dismissing the concern, Steinberger demonstrated openness by requesting the user's account details and committing to manually reinstate their access to the OpenClaw Discord group. This response highlights how Web3 communities navigate the balance between maintaining focused discussion spaces and preserving member inclusivity—even when a simple Bitcoin mention triggers automated moderation. The incident reflects broader questions about how project communities should moderate content while remaining welcoming to legitimate participants.