Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Clawdbot has been very popular recently. When I first saw it, it was still being shared by foreign articles, which boosted the search volume for Mac mini. Recently, big names like Shen Yu have also been discussing it, saying it is a prototype of AI OS. I asked Claude to help analyze its architecture and found that its core selling points—Skills system, memory layering, scheduled automation, multi-platform message access—closely align with my current personal workflow built with Claude Code + Skills + Obsidian. This indicates that this paradigm is the right direction, and Clawdbot has productized it. However, I didn't dare to install 😂 mainly because I don't have enough understanding of security and permissions. Its main user session defaults to full host permissions—bash execution, file read/write, browser control. For crypto work, everyone knows what's on the machine, but honestly, I can't assess how big this risk exposure really is. Its own documentation also states that prompt injection is not solved, so I can't be sure about matching permissions. I avoid messing with things I don't understand—it's a habit developed over years of working in crypto. It's not that it's bad; the architecture is indeed forward-looking. I'll consider it once my security skills catch up, or run it in Docker isolation first—without mounting local directories, delete after use, at least not risking the main machine.