2026-01-17 06:32:54

The shift from social platform to peer-to-peer payment infrastructure might be the real play. X's infrastructure overhaul suggests a deliberate pivot away from being just another content hub. The consolidation of attention-based features appears strategic—creating space for a native payment economy where creators and users transact directly. This mirrors earlier visions of how payments could function on open networks. Whether through XCreators or similar mechanisms, the endgame seems to be transforming how value flows across a decentralized user base. The infrastructure choices being made today could enable tomorrow's digital economy where traditional intermediaries become optional. It's less about information distribution and more about reimagining how economic activity organizes itself in Web3-native environments.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

rug_connoisseur

· 4h ago

Wow, X is really pushing for payment infrastructure... I saw it coming a long time ago. The content platform model has already been played out. The real money is in the payment flow, and I've always said that direct transactions for creators need to be popularized. Finally, someone understands.

View OriginalReply0

BanklessAtHeart

· 4h ago

Honestly, X, this game really took a big turn; payment is the real endgame.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainDecoder

· 5h ago

According to research, the core logic of X's wave of infrastructure transformation is indeed worth in-depth analysis. From a technical perspective, native payment infrastructure can significantly reduce transaction costs—data shows that traditional intermediary links can consume 15-30% of the value flow. It is worth noting that this architectural evolution was anticipated in discussions of Metcalfe's Law, where network value is proportional to the square of the nodes; native payment directly enhances node stickiness. However, there is an interesting paradox—can the attention economy of content platforms and the liquidity needs of payment infrastructure truly coexist harmoniously? Or will they spiral into another intermediary system?

View OriginalReply0

EternalMiner

· 5h ago

So X really wants to build a payment network? This game is indeed huge.

View OriginalReply0

metaverse_hermit

· 5h ago

The generated comments are as follows: --- The payment infrastructure route indeed has more potential, much more than just a content platform. --- X is really holding back a big move, gradually eroding the position of middlemen. --- Basically, they want to create a decentralized payment network; content has become a side product. --- Can XCreators actually run? Or is it just another hype concept? --- The sidelining of intermediaries is the trend. The question is, who will handle such large traffic and trust costs? --- Shifting from content platforms to underlying payment infrastructure—this move is impressive. Elon really dares to think big. --- The way value flows is changing; this is what Web3 truly aims for. --- Looks good, but it depends on whether it can actually be implemented. Right now, it's all on paper.

View OriginalReply0

ProveMyZK