Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Want to move USD1 to Arbitrum? It sounds simple, but there's a lot of complexity beneath the surface.
Lista DAO started on the BNB Chain, but the real DeFi business operates across multiple chains. For USD1, a stablecoin, to truly circulate, just staying on BNB Chain isn't enough. Cross-chain transfer is inevitable, but it also introduces new risks, especially for advanced users who operate across multiple chains.
Currently, USD1 can be transferred via cross-chain bridges to mainstream networks like Arbitrum and Ethereum. Sounds good, but don't be fooled by appearances. There are two main pitfalls here.
**First Pitfall: Security of Cross-Chain Bridges**
When you transfer USD1 through a cross-chain bridge, your trust relationship changes. Originally, you trusted the Lista protocol itself; now, you also have to trust the bridge. If the bridge encounters a problem, your assets could be lost. There have been numerous cases of cross-chain bridges being attacked or exploited, and these are not rare events.
Therefore, you must clarify: Is USD1 using the official bridge or a third-party bridge? Has this bridge undergone security audits? What's the background of the team behind it? All these factors directly impact your fund safety. Official bridges tend to be safer, but third-party bridges might offer better liquidity. It's a trade-off.
**Second Pitfall: Liquidity on the Target Chain**
Even if USD1 successfully crosses over, another reality awaits—you need sufficient liquidity on the target chain. For example, on DEXs like Uniswap or Curve, how deep are the USD1 trading pools? If the pools are shallow, large swaps could cause significant slippage, eating into your profits.
You need to do your own calculations: What's the total liquidity of USD1 on the target chain? What do the slippage curves look like for main trading pairs? How much can $100,000 convert into, and what slippage will that produce? Quantify these factors; otherwise, you'll regret it when you find the liquidity isn't enough.
**What's the safest way to operate?**
If you're just doing simple lending or arbitrage, the smartest approach is to keep all operations on the BNB Chain. Reducing cross-chain steps lowers risk and saves on fees. This is the most straightforward solution.
If you truly need to move USD1 to other chains, treat it as an independent risk unit. Specifically, evaluate all costs involved in cross-chain transfer—including bridge security risks, target chain liquidity, slippage, and fees. Then, strictly control the amount transferred in a single operation—don't move large sums all at once.
Expanding the ecosystem is a good thing, indicating USD1 is growing outward. But this growth comes with risks, which ultimately you must bear. Instead of blindly trusting the convenience of cross-chain transfers, spend more time understanding and managing the actual risks.