Has the policy direction changed? Negotiations between the government and the crypto industry seem to have reached a new turning point.



It is reported that the U.S. government is reevaluating its stance on legislation related to the structure of the cryptocurrency market. The key turning point was when a major compliant platform suddenly changed its position without sufficient communication—this move triggered a strong response from the government. The government considers this a "backstab" in the negotiation process; more importantly, the government has explicitly stated that a single enterprise cannot represent the entire crypto ecosystem.

Here is an interesting issue of power division. The government emphasizes that it is promoting a systematic market framework, rather than the private agenda of a single exchange. Especially on topics like bank yield protocols involving multiple stakeholders, industry consensus is necessary rather than unilateral decisions.

From a market perspective, this reflects the subtle game between the crypto industry and traditional financial regulators—aiming to promote innovation-friendly policies while balancing the interests of the banking system. Policy-making authority always resides with the government, but how it is implemented depends on whether all parties can return to the negotiation table to find a balance.

#数字资产市场动态 $DUSK $BTC
DUSK138.12%
ETH-3.43%
BTC-2.69%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ZKProofstervip
· 7h ago
lol one exchange thinks they can pull a fast one on the feds? technically speaking, that's not how protocol-level governance works. you need consensus, not some ceo's unilateral flip-flop. trustless systems require actual commitment, not backroom deals.
Reply0
rug_connoisseurvip
· 01-17 21:37
Ha, the internal conflicts start again. This is the norm in web3. --- Backstabbing by a certain exchange? Laughable. The government is just waiting for this kind of opportunity. --- Basically, it's still a power game. No one should expect to eat alone. --- I just want to know if the retail investors will still be the ones hurt in the end... --- Systemic framework? Sounds good, but in reality, it's just more regulation. --- Now they finally remember the need for consensus. Why didn't they do this earlier? --- Bank interests vs. innovation—this contradiction can't be resolved, right? --- The compliant platforms changing faces so quickly—driven by interests, everyone. --- We all know the government holds power, it just depends on who can survive the longest at the negotiation table. --- Another good show. Continuing to observe.
View OriginalReply0
NoStopLossNutvip
· 01-17 06:25
Haha, this is political game theory. A major platform directly backstabbing government negotiations, this move is really bold. A big V platform wants to go solo and shake off the government, but ends up being pressed down on the negotiation table by the government... Industry consensus is just a joke; it's always been a fragmented mess. Looking at it this way, the government's change in attitude isn't really because we're so strong—it's that no one wants to dance alone. Wait, could this backfire and negatively impact the entire ecosystem... What if the government becomes even stricter? I just want to know who will be the last to cry out and exit this round; anyway, it won't be the government.
View OriginalReply0
FloorSweepervip
· 01-17 06:15
Ha, starting to shift the blame again? A single company can't represent the ecosystem, so who can the government represent?
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticLayervip
· 01-17 06:15
Huh? A major platform backstabbing? This plot is pretty outrageous, and the government directly broke their defenses... It feels like this game is far from over.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainBreathervip
· 01-17 06:10
Ha, it's the same old "backstabbing" rhetoric. Who in the industry truly believes this official talk... Honestly, it's still a power game.
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCutvip
· 01-17 06:01
Haha, backstabbing is just backstabbing. In this circle, no one can be trusted. This time, the government is really getting anxious. Playing this move on compliant platforms is not worth it. Having to renegotiate again? Who knows when that day will come. I bet five bucks that in the end, everyone will just compromise, no one can win. The key is that this group of exchanges really doesn't represent the ecosystem. It's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)