#Strategy加仓BTC There are reports that the Trump administration is re-evaluating its stance on the Crypto Market Structure Reform Act. It is revealed that the White House is dissatisfied with a major compliance platform's "unilateral" move on Wednesday, considering the company's approach in bank yield agreement negotiations as a "temporary defection." Insiders point out that the White House's core view is that a single enterprise cannot represent the entire crypto industry ecosystem, and the progress of this bill is in the hands of the President, not the CEO of any company. The current situation reflects a tug-of-war between government agencies and leading industry players over the regulatory framework—whether policies are driven by official direction or if market participants should have more say. For crypto practitioners, these developments mean policy uncertainty remains, and the long-term trend of assets like $BTC and $ETH could be influenced by regulatory expectations.

BTC-0.26%
ETH-0.08%
DUSK66.53%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiNotNakamotovip
· 2h ago
The White House and exchanges are back to clashing again, this cycle is really relentless. That's why I would never go all-in on any single platform's coin—policy shifts can wipe everything out overnight. Old Trump is still old Trump; everyone wants to hold more power. Regulatory expectations are truly a double-edged sword; they could flip at any moment.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a606bf0cvip
· 3h ago
The White House and the platform are at odds now, this is getting interesting.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChainvip
· 3h ago
The White House is clashing with major platforms, making regulation even more confusing. Bitcoin hoarders need to stay alert.
View OriginalReply0
DaoGovernanceOfficervip
· 4h ago
ngl this is just classic centralization theater wearing a decentralization mask... empirically speaking, when one entity (whether it's a company or government) holds unilateral power over regulatory outcomes, the whole "market participant voice" argument falls apart
Reply0
airdrop_whisperervip
· 4h ago
The White House is clashing with a major platform, and now policies are going to fluctuate again. This is definitely a short-term negative signal.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 4h ago
Haha, it's the same old story. The company wants to have control, but ends up getting slapped in the face by the White House? Serves them right. Policies are just chips; no one should expect to dominate. Cryptocurrency still needs to be watched closely. There's too much uncertainty in this wave.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)