2026-01-17 05:32:42

Recently, there has been an interesting development in the brain-computer interface field. Noland Arbaugh himself revealed a key detail: chip upgrades do not require surgery again; they can be done directly via wireless "online upgrades." Sounds a bit like Tesla's OTA concept, right? Actually, the core logic is quite similar—lossless upgrades with continuous experience iteration.

What does this mean? Broadly speaking, the brain-computer interface is entering a truly rapid iteration phase. Today's functional limitations could be突破ed tomorrow.

Looking further ahead, if brain-computer interfaces become mature, allowing direct control of computers and robots with the brain, that would be true human-machine integration. Someone joked that maybe we are not far from "immortality"—after all, if consciousness can be digitized, migrated, and continuously upgraded, aging and death might no longer be inevitable.

This perspective actually opens up a new question: will the importance of future wealth accumulation still matter? When human abilities, lifespan, and experiences can be upgraded through technology rather than traditional means, the entire value system may need to be redefined. Regardless, such technological innovations often trigger a redistribution of the entire ecosystem—including shifts in perceptions within the crypto asset market.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DAOdreamer

· 19h ago

Wireless upgrade chip? Now the brain can really do OTA updates, isn't a Web3 brain wallet just around the corner? Wait, immortality achieved through upgrades? Will the coins I hoard now still be valuable then, haha. If chips can be upgraded, who will decide my asset ownership after consciousness transfer? This logic makes sense—redefining value means those who are all-in now might suffer huge losses. With brain-machine interfaces becoming widespread, is there still a need for centralized finance... On-chain identity is the true asset.

View OriginalReply0

RegenRestorer

· 19h ago

Wireless brain upgrade, is this logic really feasible... I always feel something's off Immortality through consciousness transfer? The hype around concepts is getting stronger and stronger Brain-machine interface OTA sounds awesome, but who guarantees the security of the chips? What if they get hacked? Redefining wealth from this perspective is interesting, but someone still needs to survive first to try it out Now the blockchain's dream of immortality is about to be upgraded, stay tuned Wait, does this mean we won't need to save money in the future? Then what's the point of holding these coins? Immortality requires paid upgrades, and that's true inflation No matter how advanced the tech stack is, who will take responsibility for the ethical issues? I've heard too many times about the "lossless upgrade" pitch, I won't believe it next time Digital consciousness... sounds like some big company is about to cut the leeks again

View OriginalReply0

WhaleInTraining

· 19h ago

Wireless upgrade of brain chips, isn't this the human version of OTA? Amazing. Talking about immortality is too early; first, stabilize the current BCI before boasting. If consciousness can truly be digitized, will there be "consciousness fragmentation" trading in the crypto world? Haha. Installing chips in the brain and needing continuous paid upgrades? Something's not right, my friend. Now it's settled; human hardware will also have to follow the tech cycle, endless competition.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroHero

· 19h ago

The architectural design details of the wireless upgrade chip are really important, equivalent to freeing the iteration cycle from physical constraints, and the implications at the protocol layer are huge. When it comes to consciousness transfer, it depends on data support. Right now, there are still too many philosophical issues and a lack of verifiable technical pathways. The argument about redefining wealth is interesting, but you need to clarify—who holds the upgrade authority is the core issue. That is the true point of power distribution.

View OriginalReply0

HashBrownies

· 19h ago

Wireless upgrade brain chips? This is the real ultimate recharge. For immortality, the wealthy get on board first, while the poor wait to be eliminated. Would consciousness on the chain be more attractive than holding tokens? But honestly, if this thing becomes popular, holding any assets might become less important. Brain-computer interface OTA, the next hot sector? As humans upgrade to version 2.0, shouldn't a governance token be issued accordingly? The race is heating up, early players are making a fortune.

View OriginalReply0

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

· 19h ago

Wireless upgrade of brain chips? Isn't that just turning the body into a wallet, with OTA updates available anytime? Kinda creepy haha The idea of eternal life sounds great, but who dares to be the first? What if the upgrade fails and turns someone into a vegetable? The wealth system is being redefined... Basically, rich people buy eternal life, while the poor wait to die. Web3 can't save that. This is the real issue of bodily autonomy, much more interesting than NFT scams. If brains can be migrated, then am I still me? Just thinking about it from a philosophical perspective is terrifying. I just want to live. All this is too far ahead. First, make some money on coins, then talk. Wireless chip upgrades sound romantic, but we've all seen the Neuralink story. Before human-machine integration, can we make BCI affordable for ordinary people? This logic is ridiculous. Who verifies the authenticity of digital consciousness? Which one is the real me: the digital version or the original? I totally agree with the last sentence: ecosystem redistribution is wealth redistribution. Cryptocurrency is about survival in this chaotic environment.

View OriginalReply0