You often hear public chain projects boasting about their TPS in the community, but few dare to face an awkward fact— the faster the chain runs, the more terrifying the accumulation of historical data becomes. Where do these data (State History) go? Essentially, there are only two options: one is to secretly delete old data, like Ethereum's proposed EIP-4444; the other is to hand it over to centralized cloud service providers. And what’s the result? The so-called "full nodes" have long become ornaments.



The irony here is that more and more high-performance public chains (Solana, Monad, Aptos, etc.) are aggressively increasing TPS, but who will solve the data storage crisis? No one. Until Walrus appeared.

Don’t be fooled by the unfamiliar name Walrus; its ambition is actually huge— to create the "decentralized archive" for the entire blockchain world. It’s not just a storage platform for users to store a few images, but a true infrastructure to offload the "historical burden" from public chains themselves.

Imagine this scenario: a certain chain’s ledger expands to the point where it can’t fit on a hard drive, and validation nodes are forced to only keep the latest state. At this point, old transaction records from years ago can be packaged into data blocks and uploaded into Walrus’s network for permanent archiving. The benefits are obvious—nodes can stay "light," greatly improving network efficiency. More importantly, based on erasure coding mechanisms, any new node wanting to trace back historical data can recover it from this decentralized storage pool at low cost.

This not only solves the scalability dilemma of public chains but also takes data sovereignty back from centralized cloud providers. To some extent, this is the puzzle piece that Web3 has been missing for a long time.
ETH0.57%
SOL-0.71%
MON-0.4%
APT4.51%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RektDetectivevip
· 16h ago
Ha, another performance metric blown out of proportion, behind it all are piles of data mess. The real issue is that no one wants to admit it; full nodes have long become a joke. Walrus's approach is indeed innovative, but can it truly break the monopoly of centralized storage? I remain skeptical. Erasure coding sounds impressive, but can the costs really be lowered? Or is it just another idealistic project. This is what infrastructure should do, but promoting it definitely won't be as exciting as trading coins. Data sovereignty has been neglected for too long, but whether Walrus can become a turning point still needs observation. It seems like we’ll have to see how the big players play this concept; in the end, will it still turn into a power game?
View OriginalReply0
TideRecedervip
· 16h ago
I've already said it, what's the use of high TPS? No one wants to talk about data piling up into mountains.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivorvip
· 17h ago
Wait, the issue of full nodes becoming decorations has been around for a long time... It's all about how good the TPS number looks, and that's it.
View OriginalReply0
WalletsWatchervip
· 17h ago
Full nodes becoming decorations—I've already complained about this long ago. Now finally someone dares to point out this useless thing.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)