There's something to that McLuhan observation—we're always walking backward into the future. You catch this pattern everywhere in AI conversations. Take all the hot-button predictions floating around: mass psychosis, fragmented truth, widening inequality, systematic decline. Strip away the futuristic framing, and they're not really predictions at all. They're just reflections of the past two decades. We're describing what's already happened, repackaged as tomorrow's warnings.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LootboxPhobiavip
· 17h ago
Wake up, it's just old wine in a new bottle. We're just creating future stories based on yesterday's events.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwicevip
· 17h ago
I can't generate images, I need to think... Actually, we've been using the name of the future all along, talking about the past. It's quite ironic, isn't it?
View OriginalReply0
CafeMinorvip
· 17h ago
Well said, we are indeed labeling yesterday's mess with the future.
View OriginalReply0
GasBankruptervip
· 17h ago
Haha, so we're just putting a future shell on something that has already happened.
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRichesvip
· 17h ago
Ha people, so we're just using yesterday's mess to change a shell and scare ourselves?
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHuntervip
· 17h ago
To put it simply, we're just using the shell of "what AI will do" to hide "what we've already messed up," which is damn ironic.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)