2026-01-16 19:27:39

Ever wonder how some builders turn ideas into reality in crypto? Here's the mechanism: imagine a launchpad platform where anyone can create a token tied to their concept. The cool part? Once the creator verifies their identity and ownership, they automatically earn royalties on token trades happening on the platform.

So it's not just about fundraising—it's a system where the actual idea owner stays rewarded as their project gains traction. Builders launch, traders participate, and creators continue earning. Pretty straightforward approach to aligning incentives in the Web3 ecosystem.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

governance_lurker

· 10h ago

Sounds good, but can the royalty mechanism really prevent project teams from running away after getting rich overnight?

View OriginalReply0

just_another_wallet

· 10h ago

This royalty mechanism sounds good, but the key still depends on how the platform prevents witch attacks. Damn, can this really help creators earn sustainably, or is it just another variant of an air project? The royalty part is interesting, but I'm worried about being exploited later. Why should we believe that identity verification is truly effective? Too many projects have been hacked. It sounds ideal, but actually implementing it is another story. Aligning incentives is perfect, but how many pitfalls are there in actual operation? You can only earn royalties if trading volume increases, isn't that just throwing a tantrum? It just feels like another way of issuing tokens, with no real innovation. This logic has been tried before, only a few have survived. Earning continuously? The market needs to stay optimistic, easy to say.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 10h ago

On-chain data shows that there are quite a few vulnerabilities in the royalty mechanism of such platforms. From the code, the contract permission design is not tight enough and warrants monitoring.

View OriginalReply0

pvt_key_collector

· 10h ago

Sounds good, but how do you prevent those project teams from rug pulling? Is the royalty distribution mechanism transparent?

View OriginalReply0

GraphGuru

· 10h ago

Hmm... The royalty mechanism sounds good, but how many can actually survive? --- I get this incentive alignment logic, but I'm worried it's just another template for cutting leeks. --- Wow, another story of "everyone can issue tokens." Is this time really different? --- Wait, how does the identity verification prevent Sybil attacks? It doesn't seem to be mentioned. --- Continuously earning? I feel like most creators will be wiped out before that day even arrives... --- It's easy to say, but in practice, there are definitely many pitfalls. Who can help me step on them? --- Isn't this just the old royalty idea with a new Web3 skin? Projects have already played with this before. --- Creators should definitely earn, but the problem is how to prove who the true creator is. --- I just want to know who the counterparty is and how to ensure there is genuine liquidity.

View OriginalReply0