Early on, the Ethereum network was extremely congested, and transaction fees were exorbitant. In 2017, Joseph Poon and Vitalik Buterin jointly proposed the Plasma scaling solution—simply put, a layered "chain within a chain" structure that moves most transaction computation and data processing from the main chain to child chains. This can increase throughput to nearly unlimited levels.



**How does it work?**

The idea behind Plasma is actually quite simple. You create multiple independent child chains on the main chain, each equipped with its own block producers and consensus mechanism (which can be PoS, PoA, etc.). Users lock assets (ETH or ERC-20 tokens) from the main chain into the child chains, enabling fast and cheap transactions on these chains. These transactions are confirmed quickly on the child chains, and then the child chains periodically (every few minutes or hours) submit a compressed hash of a batch of transactions—known as the "state root" or "block header"—back to the main chain as cryptographic proof to verify the validity of the child chain's state.

**How is security ensured?**

The security model of Plasma primarily relies on an economic game mechanism: fraud proofs. The main chain acts as the ultimate security layer. If a malicious operator on a child chain attempts to steal user funds or tamper with transaction records, any honest participant can submit a fraud proof to expose this. This design makes malicious behavior costly for operators, thereby ensuring the system's security from an economic perspective.
ETH-0.57%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ApeShotFirstvip
· 10h ago
Damn, Plasma really saved the day back then. Thinking about gas fees now, it's just so hopeless. Wait, is the fraud proof set really solid or just theoretical? How does it actually perform in practice? When Rollup first emerged, I knew Plasma was probably dead on arrival, haha. Chain-in-chain, huh? Sounds simple but is actually insanely complicated. No wonder it didn't take off later. Scaling, to be honest, is still a gamble—the bigger the scale, the greater the risk.
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBrovip
· 10h ago
Plasma was indeed a lifesaver back then, but to be honest, rollups are now the mainstream.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetectivevip
· 10h ago
Haha, the gas fees back then were really crazy. Looking at Plasma's "chain within a chain" approach now, it's quite clever.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySlayervip
· 10h ago
Back then, Plasma was just a concept; actual implementation is more reliably achieved through rollups.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_whisperervip
· 10h ago
Damn, the gas fees back then were really insane. Just thinking about it now makes me nervous.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdropvip
· 10h ago
The gas fees back then were really incredible. People are still complaining about it now, haha.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)