Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Recently came across a technical architecture analysis of Dusk, and the most interesting part is its understanding of privacy design — it’s not the traditional "privacy first" concept, but rather making privacy a native component at the protocol layer.
Most blockchain projects handle privacy by like applying a frosted film on transparent glass. Privacy features are added later, require user activation, and often come with performance overhead. This approach at the architectural level sets its ceiling.
What’s different is that Dusk has built-in zero-knowledge proof computation capabilities from the design stage of its virtual machine instruction set. In other words, every smart contract, every transaction, and every state update naturally possesses privacy attributes — this is not optional, but the default state. You don’t need to "enable privacy mode"; privacy is just there.
This design philosophy is very evident in practical applications. For example, when a financial institution builds a digital bond issuance platform on Dusk, the ability for investors to subscribe anonymously does not require additional custom development; it can be achieved directly by calling standard APIs. From requirement proposal to feature deployment, the process is greatly simplified.
From a system architecture perspective, this approach changes the trade-off between privacy and performance. Traditional solutions are always entangled between the two, but native design at the protocol layer allows them to coexist more naturally. Perhaps this is why reading this technical document doesn’t feel like a product manual, but rather a systematic solution in the field of financial cryptography.