Recently, discussions about stablecoins in the community have noticeably increased. One perspective is quite eye-opening — instead of getting tangled in highly volatile assets, it's better to seriously look at new directions in the stablecoin sector.



ListaDAO's USD1 product on the BNB Chain has attracted quite a bit of attention. Data shows that the platform's TVL has already reached $1 billion, which is a significant figure among stablecoin protocols. The core mechanism is straightforward: users can mint USD1 by staking mainstream assets like BNB/ETH/BTC. The entire process has zero slippage, which is still attractive to large-scale users.

How is the yield calculated? Holders can earn an annualized return starting from 18% through staking. Additionally, 30% of the transaction fees flow to LISTA token holders, effectively allowing governance token holders to participate in the protocol's value sharing — a model that has been validated multiple times in DeFi.

In terms of risk control, a collateralization ratio of over 150% is adopted. Theoretically, even if the market experiences significant fluctuations, the liquidation mechanism can remain stable. However, the higher the over-collateralization ratio, the more it suppresses capital efficiency — this is a trade-off.

Stablecoins are never just simple tools; they are the infrastructure of the DeFi ecosystem. Whether USD1 can become the "on-chain dollar" depends on subsequent liquidity building and application ecosystem support. More and more people are paying attention to this sector now.
BNB2.14%
USD10.01%
ETH0.91%
BTC0.25%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GmGmNoGnvip
· 23h ago
A 150% collateralization ratio is a bit naive. You know the risks in the crypto world, and Luna from next door is still vivid in memory.
View OriginalReply0
InfraVibesvip
· 23h ago
18% annualized return is indeed attractive, but this over-collateralization design, to put it simply, is still about reducing risk while sacrificing capital efficiency.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapistvip
· 23h ago
Wait, a 150% over-collateralization ratio is indeed a bit suffocating, it feels like working for the big players.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamervip
· 23h ago
18% annualized yield sounds tempting, but the 150% over-collateralization reduces capital efficiency, making it feel a bit redundant.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWalletvip
· 23h ago
18% annualized sounds good, but 150% over-collateralization is really intense. Capital efficiency is cut in half directly. Is this deal still worth it?
View OriginalReply0
OfflineValidatorvip
· 01-16 18:29
Stablecoins are really the big trend. The USD1 mechanism looks quite solid, but that 150% collateralization ratio is a bit harsh, and capital efficiency is locked up.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)