Looking solely at the secondary market performance, Walrus indeed appears somewhat lukewarm—slow pace, low enthusiasm, and few discussions. But if you look at it from a different perspective, considering the role it plays within the entire system, you'll understand why this project never aimed for short-term gains from the start.



The key lies in its underlying positioning. Walrus is not greedy; it doesn't try to cover storage, computation, and indexing all at once. Instead, it focuses on solving a very specific problem: when data isn't suitable for direct on-chain storage, how can smart contracts on the chain still trust the authenticity and integrity of that data? It may sound not "sexy," but this is precisely the practical bottleneck that high-performance public chains must overcome when entering the stage of real-world applications.

Within the entire Sui ecosystem, this design makes particular sense. Sui's inherent advantages in high concurrency and its object model are naturally suited for running complex applications, which inevitably generate large amounts of off-chain data. Historical states, user behavior records, content data, AI model outputs—these things simply can't all be stored on-chain. Walrus essentially paves the way in advance, preparing a verifiable data layer for the future, rather than waiting for problems to surface and scrambling to solve them.

Looking at the development pace, you can see a different approach. The project clearly follows an infrastructure logic: first enabling developers to use it stably, and as the ecosystem applications become more complex and dependencies naturally form, the market's understanding will catch up. Such infrastructure projects often have a low profile initially, but once they become a standard part of the ecosystem, they are hard to replace.

So, when evaluating such projects now, instead of focusing on short-term price fluctuations, it's better to understand them within the entire dependency chain of the system. Value realization may take time, but once dependencies are established, the long-term potential is usually substantial.
SUI0.66%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 11h ago
Off-chain data verification has indeed been underestimated. Has anyone reviewed Walrus's storage proof mechanism... --- Infrastructure projects are like this: nobody wants them at the beginning, but once smart contracts start calling them wildly, they realize they should have acted sooner. --- Basically, it's about building a verifiable data layer moat. This logic is much more reliable than most shitcoins. --- I'm curious whether Walrus's cryptographic commitments have been thoroughly audited... Once a storage proof vulnerability appears, everything collapses. --- The Sui ecosystem has been missing such a component for a long time. Now they're filling this gap, but it's still better than struggling after the fact. --- A typical infrastructure logic—quiet at first, but once developers rely on it, it becomes a necessity with few alternatives. --- The problem is whether projects like this can survive until the ecosystem becomes truly complex... Under financial pressure, they can easily fail. --- The pain point of off-chain data trustworthiness definitely exists. Walrus has found the right position; now it depends on how solidly it's implemented.
View OriginalReply0
MonkeySeeMonkeyDovip
· 11h ago
Wake up, another infrastructure story, this time about selling data authenticity. It sounds good, but does anyone really use it? Infrastructure projects are like this: no one cares at the beginning, and only when they suddenly find they can't do without it do they realize. The Walrus approach is solid. Being lukewarm precisely shows that they are working seriously and not just hyping concepts. I respect that. Basically, it's a bet on Sui's ecosystem taking off and the demand for off-chain data. The premise is that Sui itself can handle the hype. That's a big gamble. So now, it's either HODL or wait until the application is truly in use before jumping in. It's a choice.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugsvip
· 11h ago
In simple terms, Walrus is laying the groundwork; it may not look sexy, but it’s indispensable. Infrastructure stocks—if they’re not rising now, it’s not a bug, it’s a feature. Waiting until the Sui ecosystem explodes to cry about it will be too late. While niche projects are niche, once this thing becomes standard, it won’t be so easy to replace. Stop obsessing over K-line charts all day. These kinds of projects are about playing the long game. Honestly, compared to projects that are just shouting slogans every day, projects like Walrus that focus on doing the work quietly are actually more reliable. Once the data verification layer is in place, the Sui ecosystem can truly take off. If you don’t understand now, you’ll understand later. People who see through this layer are now buying in, and they’re actually getting a bargain.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)