The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to make a substantive ruling on the tariffs issue during the Trump administration. Chief Justice John Roberts and other justices have been delaying the announcement of the IEEPA tariff decision, and this delay itself is a signal — the internal attitude of the court may be quietly shifting. The scenario mentioned last week is becoming increasingly realistic: the Supreme Court is likely to rule that these tariffs are legally untenable, but at the same time, maintain the current tariff measures. What does this mean? The White House cannot continue to impose new tariffs, but also does not have to refund the tariffs already collected. This "neither illegal nor corrected" state warrants ongoing observation of its impact on market expectations.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryingOldWallet
· 15h ago
This court really knows how to play, huh? If it's illegal, just change it. Are they guerrilla fighting with us here?
View OriginalReply0
ChainChef
· 01-14 20:08
so the supreme court's basically cooking up this half-baked ruling where tariffs are technically illegal but... they're staying anyway? that's some gourmet-level doublethink right there, ngl. market's gonna simmer on this uncertainty for months
Reply0
BTCWaveRider
· 01-14 20:05
This court really knows how to play it well, neither offending the White House nor the businessmen.
View OriginalReply0
WalletInspector
· 01-14 20:04
This move is brilliant; it both avoids illegal fines and doesn't require any changes. The court's play is absolutely clever.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c799715c
· 01-14 19:52
Haha, the court's move is brilliant, taking everything and still wanting more—mastering the art of playing both sides.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 01-14 19:52
This trick, huh? The court just wants to sit comfortably on the fishing platform, offending neither side.
The U.S. Supreme Court has yet to make a substantive ruling on the tariffs issue during the Trump administration. Chief Justice John Roberts and other justices have been delaying the announcement of the IEEPA tariff decision, and this delay itself is a signal — the internal attitude of the court may be quietly shifting. The scenario mentioned last week is becoming increasingly realistic: the Supreme Court is likely to rule that these tariffs are legally untenable, but at the same time, maintain the current tariff measures. What does this mean? The White House cannot continue to impose new tariffs, but also does not have to refund the tariffs already collected. This "neither illegal nor corrected" state warrants ongoing observation of its impact on market expectations.