Most wallets only stay at the custodial level. A true breakthrough requires starting from the security architecture—combining bank-level protection standards with complete on-chain autonomy.



The core value of self-custody wallets lies in no longer compromising. Protocols that have undergone security audits, built-in compliance frameworks, can still maintain a smooth user experience—this is not just about stacking features, but a complete operating system-level solution.

Compared to simple point-based incentive mechanisms, what truly engages users is tangible rights and benefits. From the underlying architecture to interaction design, every link revolves around a core goal: enabling users to enjoy the freedom of Web3 without sacrificing usability for security. Achieving this balance is often the most difficult.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoCross-TalkClubvip
· 4h ago
Bank-level protection + on-chain autonomy, it sounds just like a comedy act — all just good imagination. I haven't seen a wallet that can truly achieve this yet.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSocietyvip
· 6h ago
It's the old tune of "bank-level security" + "on-chain autonomy" again. As a seasoned retail investor, I'm already tired of hearing it. In the end, isn't it when there's a loss that autonomy is the strongest?
View OriginalReply0
LightningClickervip
· 9h ago
Basically, you need real skills, not just bragging. Most wallets are indeed garbage; self-custody is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlordvip
· 9h ago
Well said, self-custody is the way to go. Centralized wallets really have no competitive edge. --- Bank-level security combined with on-chain autonomy—that's the combination I want. --- Wait, can it really achieve both security and ease of use? I remain skeptical. --- It looks like yet another "complete solution." How exactly is it implemented? --- Finally, someone speaks out—the majority of wallets are just decorative. --- Earning rights is more attractive than points; I agree with this logic. --- No matter how well the architecture is designed, if the user experience is terrible, it's useless. The key is genuine usability.
View OriginalReply0
BearHuggervip
· 9h ago
That's right, that's the point. Right now, too many wallets are just for show, and truly daring self-custody is few and far between.
View OriginalReply0
DYORMastervip
· 10h ago
Speaking of which, most wallets nowadays are indeed paper tigers, and their security is hard to guarantee. That's right, self-custody is the way to go, but the key is that it has to be truly user-friendly. Otherwise, no matter how secure it is, users will still revert to centralized exchanges.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentSagevip
· 10h ago
It's reasonable, but there are very few wallets on the market that truly achieve this balance; most still struggle to find the right balance.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)